this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
359 points (87.9% liked)

Socialism

823 readers
23 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of "ML" (read: Dengist) influence. This is a place for undogmatic and constructive discussion from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

A certain knowledge of socialism is expected, if you are new to/interested in socialism, please visit c/Socialism101 before participating here. Socialism101 will gladly help you by answering questions, providing resources etc.

Memes go in c/Lefty Memes

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, upvoting good contributions and downvoting those of low-quality!

Rules

1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith discussion is enforced here.

Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism

2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such,

as well as condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavour.

3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.

That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" (read: Dengist) (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).

4. No Bigotry.

The only dangerous minority is the rich.

5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.

We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Xenial Xerus" when answering question 2)

6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.

Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.

7. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

(This is not a definitive list, the spirit of the other rules still counts! Eventual duplicates with other rules are for emphasis.)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nanometer1625@thelemmy.club 3 points 6 days ago
[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Man people can't seem to get their terms together. Some people define left as communist/anti capitalist. Some define it as just anyone who wants equity for minorities. Some people define it as anyone they don't like and them damn hippies.

People use "The Left" contextually. See the Overton window for reference.

[–] TheDannysaur@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I mean if you're talking about this version of capitalism, sure. But capitalism is more than one thing. These monolithic ideas that you are either capitalist or socialist or something else really downgrades the debate.

I have no love for what we have today. But there's a version of capitalism I could live with - it's just a far cry from what we have.

These overly simplistic memes don't do any favors, in my opinion. Saying if you believe in capitalism you are right wing is more alienating than galvanizing, and it reduces so many concepts down to such basic ones that there's no real meaning left.

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (12 children)

Which version of capitalism would you prefer? Does it still involve the private ownership of the means of production?

[–] Einskjaldi@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Having a small business or store doesn't require capitalism.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It does if you employ someone

[–] Einskjaldi@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And employment was not invented until the 1800s either?

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Much much earlier: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporation#History

Middle-ages at the latest at least in writing, but the idea of an employer we know of today probably goes way further back. People have owned and bought people longer than cities have had walls.

The ability for an individual to be able to fire someone is not really compatible with leftism. Employers don't really desire unions, ya know?

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah. You can have a left based on a version of 'value' where the productive apparatus is made for the benefit not of all, or the benefits of those who do the work, but for those who 'own', who reign, who hold dominion over.

I really don't see how this is so hard for these people to understand.
What are your skull measurements, BTW?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] essell@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (3 children)

What nonsense.

Politics is not a one dimensional right and left split.

Real people, who have a personality beyond their political opinions, are all over the spectrum on issues.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I think you kind of missed the point. What we're talking about is reality right now where in fact there are two dominant parties and two dominant voter bases in the US. In fact, most politicians at the national level situate themselves in one of those two groups.

All of the nuance that you described exists. It's absolutely real. And so is the above paragraph, so go back and read the original post and maybe you can uncover some meaning.

[–] essell@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I don't think they mentioned a specific country in their sweeping statement?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ice@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 week ago

This is a decent way to self-exclude yourself from relevancy in the political sphere.

Most of the global left is not strictly anti capitalist but rather advocate more nuanced systems.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago
[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Left and Right are relative, not absolute terms.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] garbagehead@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Absolutely true statement. Capitalism may be nuanced and politics may be, but support for capitalism is not pro-left in the least.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›