this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2026
21 points (81.8% liked)

Selfhosted

60093 readers
553 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts here are to be centered around self-hosting. Please ensure it is clear in your post how it relates to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or git here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require your active participation in selfhosting or related communities, or the post will be removed. No more than 10% of your posts or comments may be self-promotional, or your post will be removed. F/LOSS Exception: If your post is about a project that is completely open source & can be self-hosted in full without payment, and your account is at least 30 days old, your post is exempt from this rule as long as you continue to engage in comments.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This post is part of a series explaining the authour's steps into self-hosting again. The earlier posts were more focused on the authour's specific priorities and why it's important to them. This informed both what they are deciding to self-host and the order of deployment/how things are set up. This post is the first one that takes a more technical angle, and the initial steps they took setting things up.

I enjoyed this post, and the series by the authour, because what really comes through is the sense of why they are configuring things certain ways and what their priorities are. Many other blog posts I've read jump straight into this step - how they configured the server. But throughout this series, I really get a sense of why the authour decided to configure it a certain way and I find that enjoyable to read. They were very systematic and thorough in building an inventory of what dependencies they have and their priorities for replacements.

This post is by Tara Tarakiyee, who works at the Sovereign Tech Agency. For avoidance of doubt, I am not the authour of the blog post.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] irmadlad@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Interesting artwork selections.

[–] SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Terrible posting etiquette though. Not a peep out of OP or any rationale.

Is this a bot? Someone promoting their blog? Spam? Click bait?

[–] irmadlad@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Well, I'm willing to give a person the benefit of the doubt. OP might be in a timezone where it's night time, work time, who knows. But yeah, some interaction would be nice. OP does seem to have credentials tho: https://tarakiyee.com/author/

[–] talkingpumpkin@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Terrible posting etiquette

Agreed!

Though it's very widespread, sharing a link without a word of comment is as obnoxious as those people who send you emails with no text or subject and only an attachment.

I feel less alone knowing that someone else also hates this practice.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Is ambitiousslab@feddit.uk also the author of the blog?

A blurb about the article is nice and helps to convince people to click on the article, but it isn't necessary. From what I can tell, ambitiousslab seems to be sharing things that they find interesting and doesn't follow the pattern of the usual bot spam we deal with

[–] SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No idea because they failed to mention it.

Spam isn't just automated spam bots posting. It's unsolicited, unexplained content. A "hey, I found this interesting because X" goes a long way towards humanising things like this but YMMV.

[–] ambitiousslab@feddit.uk 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Hi, I'm choosing this comment to reply to everyone at once, since there's a lot of overlap in the comments.

I'm sorry for not following the etiquette of the community. I've updated the post to contain a blurb to explain why I liked the article. I hope it's ok but if there are any problems I'm happy to amend it or change the focus of the blurb.

I was careful to check the rules before posting, and in all other communities I actively participate in, link-only posts are completely fine, so I didn't even stop to think it could be a problem. I now appreciate that this is not the followed norm of this community though. I can see that it could be easily misinterpreted as self-promotion, since I didn't state I wasn't the authour of the post. I have subscribed to this community for a while and made a couple of comments, but this is my first post here and with the posts mixed in the rest of the feed, I guess I didn't build a good sense of the unwritten norms of the community.

I am not the authour of the blog post. This is the personal blog post of someone who works for the Sovereign Tech Agency. I appreciate their posts because they took a very thoughtful approach to why they are self-hosting certain things. Their technical approach is an extension of the "why" they are doing it and this is very clearly and explicitly laid out. This is something I quite like, and at least in the blogs I follow, relatively unique.

I am based in the UK. I always catch up on my RSS feeds before i go to bed, and if I see something interesting, I tend to share it on lemmy. I only woke up again now because of the heatwave here! Another lesson learned, if posting to this community again, do it while I'm available for the next few hours.

[–] localghost@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago

Hey I appreciate you posting this. I enjoy reading through people's thought processes when doing stuff like this to see if there's anything I can do better. Wouldn't have known about this author otherwise, cheers

Brilliant. Thanks for doing that. Appreciated.