Unfortunately most people probably won't read past the first paragraph, but this seems to me to be disingenuous reporting. The lead mentions only one of four serious charges under the UCMJ and buries the other three charges as an "oh, by the way" sentence in the third paragraph.
This dude was sentenced to 12 years for four serious crimes, not one, but the article makes it sound as if only one was important.
This is why it's important to read the whole article.