this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2026
44 points (95.8% liked)

Technology

86442 readers
2942 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] iN8sWoRLd@lemmy.world 22 points 23 hours ago

of course the bigger story here is that there is a LITE version of CNN on which uBlock and Privacy Badger find nothing to block!

[–] BlueBockser@programming.dev 12 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

AI breakthrough

That makes it sound like there's something actually new here, but it seems like it's just a Chinese company getting closer to what "Open"AI / Anthropic already have.

It's nice that these things are open ~~source~~ weights, but from a technological view this isn't a breakthrough.

Edit: Corrected to "open weights"

[–] _Nemo_@lemmy.ml 12 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It's nice that these things are open source

Open weights! = open source

[–] BlueBockser@programming.dev 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] _Nemo_@lemmy.ml 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

It feels like nitpicking, but there's a relevant difference here. If you can only access the weights (and not the training data and the learning algorithms used), it's hard to get (say) a Chinese model to freely talk about Tiananmen Square Massacre. (Just tried it locally on Deepseek R1; it's doable, but takes some prompt hacking.) The models may be freely available, but there's bias and censorship baked into them.

[–] esc@piefed.social 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Dunno about getting 'closer' but glm-5.2 is indistiguishable from what I got before from claude and openai while being cheaper.