this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2026
-4 points (37.5% liked)

Linuxsucks

391 readers
28 users here now

For knowledge and awareness about what using Linux is really like and pointing at its cultish toxic community. We also cover FOSS /FLOSS failures, and issues with GPL since it relates to Linux. Moderation is heavy handed to appeal to our target users.

Rules:

  1. FOSS (especially GPL) advocates and Linux (specifically GNU/Linux) evangelists aren't welcome (GNU Hurd will count as Linux). -We ask that you block us and we will perma-ban for violations of this rule.
  2. Try to stay on topic (that is LINUXSUCKS!). No bashing other OSs or each other. We aim for a cohesive non-toxic community with the interest of cautioning people / would be victims from Linux. At our discretion, we will remove what we consider pollution.
  3. Moderators run the sub, not the users. It's not democratic, and we don't care how you think it should be run. -Feel free to make and run your own community.
  4. "Not your Billboard" -Over-represented companies will have positive posts removed and appropriate bans may be issued. -Those companies included so far will be Valve/Steam/Proton, Google, and Brave (browser).

⚠️Collection of Articles

Linux/FOSS can damage hardware or firmware

Linux Community Advice Breaks Windows

Mixing Apps Bloats LiGNUx

Linux running servers isn't a brag

Is Linux Running Games Near Windows Performance Impressive?

Wasted Ram on Different Toolkits and Distro-Agnostic Packages in Linux

Critical ISS Systems do NOT run Linux

Abandoned Software is Dangerous (and common on Linux)

FOSS Devs Quit and Sellout on Unappreciative Userbase

Firmware Flashing is Riskier on Linux

Linux Community Toxicity Ties Directly into Inferiority Complex Psychology

The Positives of Telemetry

Game Performance Impressive?

Failures of Proton

How Linux Stores Browser Passwords is a Security Issue

The Psychology of Conspiracy Thinking

Rabid LiGNUxers Ignorantly Get Angry at Devs

Does Linux Dominate SuperComputers? -Yeah, but So What!

Linux Myths Compilation

The Linux Cult - Religious Parallels

Before Wayland: “Linux is secure, Windows is insecure.” -(Selective Dishonesty)

Why Wayland is Taking so Long

Major Desktop Applications Missing on Linux

Sudoedit vs Edit as Root

Linux is NOT Great for Developers

Kernel Level Anti-Cheat is fine!

The Privacy / Security Paradox

Linux Storing Passwords as Plain Text

How to Continue Using Unsupported Windows Online on Old Hardware

🛠️Checking for Linux Hardware Compatibility is Bullshit!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Chrome's "plaintext fallback" isn't a distro bug. It's a session‑initialization failure. And Arch is the distro most likely to ship a session that's missing the parts Chrome needs.

Chrome/Chromium on Linux never stores passwords in plaintext by design. It stores them in GNOME Keyring (GNOME, XFCE, MATE), or KWallet (Plasma). Those keyrings only work if PAM unlocks them at login, the display manager initializes the session correctly, DBus is running, the keyring has a password, auto‑login isn't bypassing the unlock step, and the WM/DE actually starts the keyring daemon.

If any of those fail, Chrome logs: "Falling back to bsic text encryption". -This fallback uses a hardcoded key ("peanuts"). It's not literal plaintext, but it's effectively plaintext.

Arch's philosophy of giving you the pieces to assemble your own system makes this failure more likely. Arch users frequently end up with greetd instead of GDM/SDDM**, Hyprland/i3/bspwm** sessions without keyring integration**, No keyring package installed at all, PAM configs copied from wikis, Auto‑login bypassing keyring unlock, Custom session scripts that forget to start gnome-keyring-daemon, and Wayland sessions missing environment variables Chrome expects.**

Arch doesn't fix any of this for you. Arch doesn't warn you. Arch doesn't ship sane defaults.

Arch's rolling model increases breakage frequency. Even if you do configure everything correctly: PAM changes, keyring updates, display manager updates, session scripts, Wayland protocol changes, Chrome/Chromium updates, and systemd changes can break the chain at any time.

Fedora, Debian, Ubuntu, Mint, Pop, etc. ship stable PAM stacks, keyring integration, display manager configs, stable session scripts, stable environment variable setups. -Arch ships whatever upstream pushed yesterday.

Arch users disproportionately run DE-less setups. Chrome expects a real desktop environment. These window managers don't start the keyring daemon, unlock the keyring, export the right environment variables, integrate PAM correctly or initialize DBus properly. (Komorebi on Windows and Mac isn't just better than their TWM's, its' safer!

Arch's documentation encourages minimalism that breaks security. Arch Wiki pages often say things like: "You can disable gnome-keyring if you don't need it.", "You can remove PAM modules you don't use.", "You can use greetd for a minimal login experience.", and "You can start your session manually from .xinitrc."

-All true. All dangerous! Chrome depends on the “bloat” you removed.

Lookout for all DIY distros like Gentoo, Void/Artix, NixOS, Slackware, and Arch derived distros or anything with greetd. -I wouldn't even touch Linux at all knowing about their other desktop security issues though.

The Problem Doesn't Exist on FreeBSD

all 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ajikeshi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

what normal person is using chrome on linux? if you go that far, you can start installing edge already