this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2026
40 points (84.5% liked)

Technology

86484 readers
3234 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago

So, more than a %?

[–] black0ut@pawb.social 12 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Last I read, the entire internet used less than 2% of the electricity we generate. Using the same amount of energy just for a spicy autocorrect is insane.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago

This is 12 years old

[–] thedevbo@feddit.online 2 points 7 hours ago

I wonder what percent of people use AI. Because I think it would show just how crazy high that power usage is.

[–] Sims@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 hours ago

Hm, isn't the problem that a strained energy grid suddenly adds a lot of demand, also makes the prices skyrocket for ordinary poor people ? Its like they switch focus away from something.

Also, using global electricity statistics that includes Chinas gigantic energy budget, for a Western problem as the one above, seems biased af. The whole article smells a bit like paid content - propaganda - to me.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 11 points 15 hours ago

It is pretty insane to use 2% of global energy for that piece of shit technology, almost exclusive developed only to give more billions to billionaires and nothing else, at a time when we desperately need to minimise energy consumption.

[–] Gamechanger@slrpnk.net 24 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Less than 2% is somewhat a shitty framing.

I would say: "More than 1%!"

[–] Zagorath@quokk.au 23 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah that's an insane amount. Nearly 1 in every 50 joules generated is currently going to generative AI. That's incredible for a single purpose.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Not entirely true. Those are the numbers for all data centers, regardless if AI was used. This includes email, streaming services, and nearly everything you do on the internet. As per the linked article, the estimate for specifically AI use is closer to 0.5% or 1 of every 200 joules

I estimate that AI consumed around 0.5% of the world’s electricity in 2025.

[–] DampSquid@feddit.uk 12 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

So a QUARTER of ALL power used by ALL data centres is for fucking AI! That's still crazy.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 3 points 12 hours ago

Especially when it's the majority of all data center buildout (if these companies had their way, the amount would be higher), the GPUs inside them presently can't be repurposed if demand doesn't catch up (or if they just depreciate), and nobody knows how to make these profitable

[–] MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io 3 points 15 hours ago

More than a quarter.

[–] AllYourSmurf@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

So using a more distributed Internet (instead of sticking all out services in data centers) would help balance that.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

that's just making more, smaller data centers. The data centers themselves are probably more efficient than an equivalent amount of compute that's spread out elsewhere, just because the cooling systems for data centers generally benefit from being huge.

The problem is that we keep building more data centers for stupid shit.