this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2026
18 points (100.0% liked)

Seattle

2089 readers
91 users here now

A community for news and discussion of Seattle, Washington and the surrounding area

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Washington joined the ranks of states like Rhode Island, Massachusetts, and Maine in enacting a so-called millionaires tax. It places a 9.9% levy on households earning more than $1 million per year. The tax doesn’t apply to the first $1 million of income — only the income beyond that threshold.

Supporters of the tax argue that it affects only a sliver of households in the state, while opponents warn it threatens opening the door to a broader statewide income tax.

Let’s Go Washington, a political action committee sponsored by hedge fund manager Brian Heywood, put forward the repeal measure. “We are proud to lead the fight to protect families and small businesses from Olympia expanding their state income tax on all Washingtonians,” he said in a statement July 15, when its initiative met the signature threshold for appearing on the ballot.

Meanwhile, a campaign urging voters to reject the repeal bid has won the backing of some high-profile Washingtonians, including travel writer Rick Steves and “Jeopardy!” winner-turned-host Ken Jennings.

Gov. Bob Ferguson (D) signed the bill creating the tax in March. It takes effect in 2028, with the first taxes due in 2029.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] specialseaweed@sh.itjust.works 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I just don't get it. Federal income and capital gains taxes are at generational lows and people still bitch about state taxes. They'll never not attack any form of tax, so feel free to completely ignore them and work towards building the city and state that we want.

fuck those guys

and yea, i make good money. fuckin tax me.

[–] Nshrubs@mstdn.social 3 points 14 hours ago

@specialseaweed @velma I WANT to be taxed to pay for libraries, parks, transit, schools, & for ALL kids to be fed free breakfast & lunch at school. I want millionaires & billionaires who inherited their wealth & assets and/or who take advantage of all that our working population provides to pay their fair share in the capital gains tax.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

If this repeal goes through, couldn't the legislature just write the same law but with added language about how the threshold won't be lowered? That seems like what most people are upset about.

Either way even if it does pass I'm sure the courts will find something wrong with it or it's process and it will be ignored like other initiatives.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 10 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

I'm curious how they're going to square it with our state constitution's restrictions on income tax.

Our taxes are already extremely regressive here. I'm not sure why people are freaking out over this income tax being applied to middle and low income households when they're already taxed more than rich households.

[–] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 5 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

There's technically no constitutional restriction on income tax, per se. The 1933 ruling in Culliton v Chase held that income is property, and the state constitution doesn't allow graduated taxes on property. Meaning any income tax would have to be a flat rate (regressive). We're trying to get around that, and the ruling that income is property could be overturned.

It would be nice if we could have a tax system in this state that doesn't punish poor people for being poor.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

It would be nice if we could have a tax system in this state that doesn’t punish poor people for being poor.

It would be SO nice!

Thanks for explaining the income tax limitations in more detail. That makes sense!

[–] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 3 points 16 hours ago

Sure thing! For some more info: the reason they're more confident about overturning that ruling now is that the 2023 ruling on the capital gains tax said that it's an excise tax on a transaction, not a tax on property.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not really freaking out because Ferguson said he would veto anything that goes below $1M. And he's already on thin ice with most voters.

What I'm worried about and this seems to be what most supporters of this initiative are pointing out is that there were amendments proposed to make sure the tax never gets lowered or it would adjust with inflation, etc. but they were shutdown very quickly.

MAGAs like Heywood wouldn't have any standing if that language was in there.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 5 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Sorry, I wasn't trying to imply that you were freaking out. I was referring more to some of my conservative coworkers that had very interesting fits about this haha.