246
submitted 10 months ago by thehatfox@lemmy.world to c/games@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] aluminium@lemmy.world 80 points 10 months ago

Oh boy, can't wait for more average but poorly managed games!

[-] slazer2au@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago

Don't forget console exclusive.

[-] Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Or just windows store exclusives..

I'll eat my fine leather hat before I use that dog shit store again.

Keep in mind that that's extra special because I don't own a fine leather hat, so I gotta buy one first.

[-] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago

If you want to eat a leather hat, just do it man. You won’t get arrested. I swear.

[-] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

This is the real hell

load more comments (23 replies)
[-] jerome@lemmy.world 62 points 10 months ago

Laws against monopolies don't exist, anymore, eh?

[-] lorty@lemmy.ml 5 points 10 months ago

After this deal MS will STILL be in third place.

[-] paultimate14@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

3rd place in... What? I'm trying to search around to see what you're referring to here, but I can't find anything.

By total market cap, Microsoft already blows these companies out of the water. By just videogame divisions, Sony and Nintendo are way farther ahead because of hardware sales, but that doesn't really make sense to include in the conversation about acquiring a publisher. I can't find any solid numbers either way isolating publishing, other than that the top 5 in recent years seems to be Tencent, Sony, Nintendo, Microsoft, and Activision/Blizzard (with EA hanging around too). Seems like any of those two merging is going to be bad for everyone other than shareholders.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] toastus@feddit.de 31 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Usually I am against huge mergers like this because they rarely benefit the customer, but ActiBlizzard was about as bad as it gets anyway.

Selfishly I hope maybe at least one decent RTS might come from this before everything gets enshittyfied again.
I realize though that OG Warcraft/Starcraft were not the big motivators for MS so the chance is probably slim.

[-] Damdy@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

You should look into Stormgate.

It's an upcoming rts from frost giant studios which consists of some of the original blizzard team responsible for StarCraft.

[-] toastus@feddit.de 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I actually got a spot in the closed alpha this month.

It feels pretty good so far even though unfortunately I can't play as much as I would like due to my job and aspects of my personal life taking a lot of time right now.
I plan on getting at least a couple more games in this weekend.

[-] Damdy@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

That's cool. I was never very good myself but I'd like to play around in the noobs ranks. I just hope there's a good story mode.

[-] andxz@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Microsoft still supports AoE2, and that game is going on 22+ years. Some of the other stuff they've released has been a bit hit and miss, but they at least tried to do something fresh.

I'll take that over ActiBlizz dropping support for the SC2 pro scene for no good reason other than "profitability" any day.

Hell, maybe they can fix WoW classic while they're at it, and say what you will about the guy but if I understand correctly even Chris Metzen is coming back.

[-] gataloca@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

Out of all these studios I suppose I like Microsoft's games the most, but I still think it's bad that the regulators didn't shoot down this merger from the view of competitiveness.

I don't think the gaming market is healthy when only a handful of corporations like Microsoft, Ubisoft, EA Games and SquareEnix hold what I assume to be 75% of the gaming AAA market. It restricts creativity and stifles competition and the ones paying the price are going to be us consumers.

Even worse if they go and start vendor locking games to Windows, which sucks for us Linux gamers or Xbox which sucks for Playstation gamers.

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 12 points 10 months ago

How many new AAA studios could be created from scratch with this money?

[-] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Not too mention losing all the devs who'll probably leave due to the merge anyway.

[-] slazer2au@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago
[-] Zoldyck@lemmy.world 36 points 10 months ago
[-] slazer2au@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

I mean for gamers in general. This merger will not benefit consumers.

[-] leftzero@lemmy.ml 32 points 10 months ago

Activision Blizzard was already about as anti-consumer as possible, so in this particular case at worst nothing will change, at best Microsoft might actually clean house and there might be some improvements for the consumers...

[-] slazer2au@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

I genuinely love your optimism.

Microsoft will use this purchase to further restrict releases to non Xbox consoles, no matter when they agree to to industry bodies. It is in Microsofts interest to only release on their platforms as releasing to PS or Switch will cost them in Xbox purchases.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Yeah but game production isn't about the consumers. It's a business.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

They've been dead since Activision merged with them.

[-] timception@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

I didn’t even get D4 yet (but planned to) and all my friends have stopped playing it already ☠️ I don’t think they have anything else up their sleeve at this point. Seems they haven’t made anything new since warcraft.

[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

Overwatch was amazing under Jeff.

[-] verysoft@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago

You say this, but Jeff was there when they started OW2. He was the one who even announced it and their plan to forcibly replace Overwatch.

[-] Deceptichum@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

And he also stated that he had to fight for even the most basic beneficial things.

He also left not long after.

All signs point to them not listening to him due to greed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RobertOwnageJunior@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

They are still pumping money like crazy though.

[-] nathris@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

D4 was dead the moment they announced D2R. Why would I pay $80 for a game with microtransactions and battlepass when I can pay $50 for a game that comes complete in box?

They should have taken D2R kept the mechanics and just rolled new classes, maps, and items.

I don't want a new game, I just want more content.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

That merger reminds me of this sketch: Halo: The Future of Gaming https://piped.video/JFtoanBDjOE

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
246 points (96.9% liked)

Games

31273 readers
1018 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS