Huh, I wonder why they were so determined to use that location of all places. I'm a huge proponent of industrial scale solar power, as imo it makes more sense for my tax/utility dollars to go to that, instead of going towards solar on my own roof, but it seems like a better location must exist.
Seattle
A community for news and discussion of Seattle, Washington and the surrounding area
Seems like most people take this stance - including the Colville Tribes - we're supportive of renewable energy, but there has to be a better spot than historical, sacred land.
The Colville Tribes chair, Cindy Marchand, praised the decision in a statement last week. “While the Colville Tribes certainly appreciates the value of renewable energy such as solar power, sacred sites must remain pristine to pass down to future generations.”
After the publication of HCN and ProPublica’s investigation, some members of the Wenatchi-P’squosa, one of the 12 Confederated Colville Tribes, held a demonstration on Badger Mountain, saying that while they support renewable energy, they’re against facilities being built on important cultural sites. Following the demonstration, Avangrid announced that it would pause development to reconsider tribal input and public response. The public comment process is one of the only avenues available for tribal nations to advocate for their rights regarding land development.
Nimbys?
Sure that's why we should tear down jerusalum to build massive nuclear power plants if you oppose this you're just a nimby.
Pretty sure indigenous people have the most claim to being NIMBY's out of all of us.