40
submitted 1 year ago by Daryl76679@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 4am@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

“We don’t know who struck first - us, or them - but, we do know it was us who blocked out the sun…”

[-] richyawyingtmv@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Literally the first thing I thought of, complete with his voice

[-] exu@feditown.com 4 points 1 year ago

Where was that quote from again?

[-] lazylion_ca@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago
[-] voidavoid@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 year ago
[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

This just sounds like a bad idea. Especially if its the "release trillions of particles" approach.

[-] DmMacniel@feddit.de 12 points 1 year ago

Anyone you seriously and unironical think about blocking out the sun needs to be removed from office and the public immediately.

[-] coolin@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

Blocking out the sun with aerosols is a good idea if you know with high confidence how it will impact the climate system and environment. That's why they're trying to simulate it with the supercomputer, so they know if it fucks stuff up or not.

[-] Suoko@feddit.it 5 points 1 year ago

I don't even believe this is a serious article, it sounds like a Simpson's episode plot. Let's ask sunglasses manufacturers to protest so that we prevent this plan (I'm Matt Groening)

[-] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

You got a better idea? Earth is cooking, convincing everybody to stop burning fossil fuel is not working, and we're out of time.

[-] DmMacniel@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

Killing not only us but the entire fauna and flora ISNT an option.

[-] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

You realize the idea is to reduce how much sunlight reaches the surface, not completely block it, right?

[-] IncidentalIncidence@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Who proposed doing that?

[-] moomoomoo309@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

Industry gives off greenhouse gasses that cause more sunlight to be trapped. It also gives off aerosols that reflect the light before it gets there, but those are in lesser amounts. This proposal is to release more of those aerosols into the atmosphere to counteract the effects of global warming. "Blocking out the sun" is just a clickbait headline. Read the article.

[-] tsuica@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

"So the leaders of men conceived of their most desperate strategy yet. A final solution: the destruction of the sky." - Animatrix, The Second Renaissance

[-] illi@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

This reads as a start of a prologue to a postapocalyptic story.

[-] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

If they get it wrong, yeah.

But not doing something like this is also most likely going to serve as the prologue to an apocalypse. Desperate times call for desperate measures…

[-] illi@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, if it would work perfectly sure. And agreed with the desperate times. But they'd need to be absolutely aure it will work and without side effects

[-] djoot@feddit.dk 9 points 1 year ago

Literally how SnowPiercer started, and I am all for it, train based survival here we go!

[-] Quentinp@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

You volunteering to reach in and clean out the stuff in the little hatch? xD

[-] BrooklynMan@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago
[-] taanegl@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

"Listen, this sun.. whatever the hell it thinks it is, is coming to ruin your life. Now I propose you not only subsidize building the sun blocker, but also pay us monthly fees afterwards to prevent this sinful ball of devilish fire from ruining your life..."

Some board room somewhere, probably...

[-] LeHappStick@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Pff no need for it, I say we do it.

this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
40 points (88.5% liked)

Technology

33707 readers
118 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS