109
How to start app via tiles (Metro-look) (feddit.de)
submitted 9 months ago by Temperche@feddit.de to c/linux@lemmy.ml
33 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hi everyone,

I'd like to have my apps as tiles within a full-screen view (ideally called via pressing the Windows button on the keyboard) in Linux, pretty much the Windows Metro look as seen above. I have all the icon files and just need to link them to the apps themselves. Might you know of a way to do that?

Thanks for your help! Temperche

top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 103 points 9 months ago

BRB, gotta wash out my eyes with bleach now.

[-] DaGeek247@kbin.social 55 points 9 months ago

Meh, i hate the design too, but i can absolutely support someone looking into making their linux install more personal.

[-] flashgnash@lemm.ee 30 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It sucks when forced on you by Microsoft but when the suffering is entirely self inflicted it's way more fun

[-] DaGeek247@kbin.social 10 points 9 months ago

Heck, that's practically the unofficial linux motto.

[-] flashgnash@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

I am somewhat convinced some part of my brain is just an agent of chaos and wants to see me suffer because the moment I get something working nicely I suddenly get the urge to change everything

[-] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 6 points 9 months ago

Sure. Whatever. But Windows 8 is really the last theme I'd ever choose.

[-] p5f20w18k@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

It looks pretty good but its usability is shit

[-] neo@lemmy.comfysnug.space 2 points 9 months ago

If it's usable for the person that wants it then all is well, just don't make this default pls

[-] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]

[-] HouseWolf@lemm.ee 67 points 9 months ago

I haven't tested it myself personally but this menu for KDE seems to be what you're looking for?

[-] user224 14 points 9 months ago

Wow! Thanks. I absolutely love this style, but I know I am in a great minority in that, so I didn't even think anyone had done this.

[-] kuneho@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

oh wow, looks pretty nice

[-] Pantherina@feddit.de 58 points 9 months ago

There will always be someone requesting the weirdest Windows features.

[-] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]

[-] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

The move makes some sense in context. Computer sales were declining and it was looking (if you're Cueball) as if the traditional desktop/laptop computer was about to die out. The Surface was being developed, tablets were all the rage, PC gaming wasn't that big yet, and so Microsoft thought "alright, K/B+mouse is out, touchscreens are in, we need to update our interface to cater for this new demographic, but we'll still allow people to use a keyboard and mouse if they really want to I guess". That's when they went all in with Windows-On-ARM (remember Windows RT?) as well.

Obviously a completely missed shot in retrospect. What Microsoft miserably failed to understand is that smartphones were in, but touch screen interfaces are absolutely awful for power users. Ya can't really use Excel or write a book on a touchscreen. And ya don't need to pay for a Windows license to browse Facebook, Twitter, and passively consume some news and video. So the "middle segment" of tablets never really had broad appeal in general, and Surface tablets especially were the middle segment of a middle segment (with android/chromebooks on one side and the iPad on the other) so the Metro UI never had a chance to make sense for more than a handful of very lonely Surface users. No wonder they scrapped it a few years later when sales of touchscreen windows devices failed to materialize.

[-] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]

[-] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

Art is a valid use-case for tablets, and actually the best one. For almost all of corporate office jobs however, tablets are a worse proposition than a regular workstation. Most people type more than they draw.

It's fine, but that means that Windows 10's "UI optimized for KB/Mouse with accessibility features for touch screens" was, in retrospect, the better choice all along. Windows 8 did the opposite and made the experience worse for everyone under the completely incorrect assumption that we were ALL going into a touchscreen-first world.

[-] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]

[-] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

Having a dedicated touchscreen shell is something that I believe GNOME and KDE are trying to achieve, but I don't know whether they succeeded UX-wise as I've never used them.

It's unfortunate that Windows 10 was a regression for touchscreens, but if MS did not have the resources/willingness to support both well, then focusing on KB+M was the right call IMO. When building Windows 8 they simply miscalculated how relevant touchscreens would/could become for Windows in the 2010s.

If you want privacy, Linux is definitely the only choice anymore. If you want privacy and a good UI, Linux may be a good choice depending on your tastes in UI. I think KDE does UI/UX right for your average power user while retaining most of Windows' UI paradigms (which is why SteamOS uses it for its desktop mode). Ironically Microsoft has actually been stealing a lot of design cues from KDE, especially with Windows 11. The lock screen of Windows 11 in particular is a straight ripoff of KDE Plasma, every time I walk in front of a locked Windows computer I have to do a double take. The rounded corners, slight Gaussian blur, cute-yet-serious font, it's all there.

[-] brax@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 months ago

Right? I'm thinking "who the frig would willingly choose this of all options‽" 🤣

[-] Drito@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I like that for Windows phones. I still have one. Screen space is saved. You choose the app you want on the main screen from a clean list instead of an icon profusion. Nowadays all phones interfaces are the same and less good than the Windows Phone interface.

Its cool on phones, but I admit, I don't need that on PC.

[-] Jean_Lurk_Picard@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago

This is the UI of my nightmares

[-] Dr_Willis@sh.itjust.works 18 points 9 months ago

It's going to depend on what desktop environment you are using, the default Gnome launcher has a huge full screen launcher setup.

there may be gnome extensions for another look.

Gnome is not the same look, but similar in its oversized UI.

I hate it.:)

I tend to use some other quick launchers. or a simple nested applications menu.

[-] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 18 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

KDE has some app launchers that look just like this, but last time I tried them, they were a little buggy🫠
But yeah, I think that would be your best bet. A good Win 8 style launcher for KDE and Kwin rules to make all apps launch fullscreen automatically.

Here's some launchers that might fit the bill:
https://store.kde.org/p/1584342/
https://store.kde.org/p/1897990/
https://store.kde.org/p/1364064/
https://store.kde.org/p/1677095/
https://store.kde.org/p/1973454/

This one is the most similar, however it did not work for me:
https://store.kde.org/p/1932321

[-] x2XS2L0U@feddit.de 11 points 9 months ago

I use rofi (on my machine with dmenu theme) and after some digging I found this: https://github.com/Dartegnian/rofi-metro You may use this on any distro as there are very few dependencies to run this simple launcher :)

[-] Guenther_Amanita@feddit.de 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I don't have a particular DE in my mind that offers this feature out of the box, but if one offers that, then it's KDE. Search for it in their application starter menu section, there's one for sure!

Question is: why do you want that?
It's wrong to judge one for their taste, that's sure. To be fair, I even liked the W8 menu when it came out.

The problem with it is, that it creates a "dive in"-effect, similar to when you enter a room and then forget what you wanted in the first place.

I personally would recommend you Vanilla Gnome. It has a similar, simplistic design language and the overview creates the opposite effect. Instead of the "enter a new room", the activity overview disconnects you from your current task and makes task switching easier while not forgetting what you originally wanted.

Are there any other reasons for why you chose the menu?

[-] mvirts@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

I'm coming from a place of complete ignorance on this, but I'm guessing this would be a straightforward gnome extension. The app menu is almost this already

[-] histic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 9 months ago

depending on how much your willing to learn eww(elowars wacky widgets) would be a very good option

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 months ago

Gnome overview maybe?

[-] Presi300@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

There is a KDE Plasma widget that adds a metroUI style tiled launch screen to the desktop... Though I don't remember it's name atm

[-] H2207@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

You could hack something together with KDE widgets (plasmoids I think?), creating an array of app launchers on your desktop.

It'd be a completly manual way of doing it though, so up to you if you think it's worth it.

[-] Secret300@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

KDE has the option

[-] WhoDestroysTheGond@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

I'm with you; I like the Metro style. If you have an Android phone, the Square Home launcher is a great implementation.

this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2023
109 points (87.6% liked)

Linux

46611 readers
1243 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
nooter692@lemmy.ml
MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz