1813
Eat the rich (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by Lazylazycat@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HandOfDoom@lemmy.world 157 points 1 year ago

While I agree that we have a duty to avoid unethical brands whenever possible, there's just no way to escape them all. I live in a poor country and I there's a lot of "bad stuff" I have to buy just because it's what I can affford at the moment.

There is no ethical consumption under capitalism.

[-] TheSaneWriter@lemm.ee 44 points 1 year ago

Fully agreed. While it is morally positive to avoid especially unethical companies, ultimately it's not possible in all cases. As long as you try to be moral in your day to day actions and you on some level push for things to be better, you're not morally culpable for the failings of the current system.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 year ago

This is true... but with some corporations it's just a case of "fuck you in particular."

[-] Glide@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 year ago

Avoiding every company that does something unethical is impossible. Imo, avoiding giving money directly to those unethical practices is what we should strive for.

Ie, Nestle is notorious for the way it acquires and sells bottled water, using legal loopholes to leave communities without drinkable water, and adding sodium to their water to keep you thirsty and drink more. So don't buy their water. Assuming enough people do so, the company will, inevitably, stop selling water and focus on products that are selling. Does Nestle as a whole deserve to fuck off? I mean, sure, but, at the very least, we can pressure companies to only engage with the practices that we consider passable.

I avoid Nestle, because fuck their water shit, I don't trust them to source cocoa reasonably either, and they are nowhere near having a monopoly on good chocolate, so they're perhaps a bad example. But we can at least push companies around, because ultimately, the only thing they give a shot about is our money.

[-] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Sure for sure. And I'm tired of people treating it like it's all or nothing, OR that it is stupid to boycott! I have my reasons why I refuse to purchase from this brand specifically and not others. We all only have so much energy (and money, mental resources etc) to be able to do so much. Let's not shit on others for trying, or others who don't want to. Maybe their energy is spent on other injustices and boycotts. Or just trying to survive. I dont like that they steal water from drought stricken communities here in America, and what they did in Africa. I have the mental resources and the luxury to boycott them so I do. You don't so you don't.

The only jerks are the ones who literally don't care because it has nothing to do with them.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] vd1n@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's when you have to ask yourself if you're ready for war. I've been stalked by drug dealers that want me to keep my mouth shut. It's all the same business minded bs mainstream or street. A heartless man is a heartless man no matter what.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] UprisingVoltage@feddit.it 86 points 1 year ago
[-] DessertStorms@kbin.social 51 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Don't get me wrong, fuck nestle, but this whole movement that's grown singling them out is so superficial it really frustrates me.
All of the companies of nestle's size are up to the exact same shit. They all exploit their employees, destroy the planet, and invest millions if not billions in union busting and lobbying.
I get that it's easier just to focus on one company, but if you want one thing to focus on, make it capitalism, the system that enables, hell, encourages, this shit, rather than individual products of it.
Even if the movement somehow managed to destroy nestle (never going to happen), destroying one company achieves nothing. Tear the whole thing down.

[-] SuperLogica@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

The Nestle boycott wasn’t founded due to exploitation of employees, unions, etc. They’re shitty and do all that stuff (and far more). But the boycott was specifically founded (in the 1970s) due to their decision to relentlessly market baby formula to vulnerable mothers, particularly in less developed countries, often in times of famine or hardship. They knowingly caused health problems in infants (who of course then grew into adults with health problems), probably caused many infant deaths, and pushed families into poverty (with all the consequences of that), for profit. 50 years later we’re still dealing with the consequences of their immoral marketing (which has never really stopped, they just change the messaging in order to comply with relevant laws, which are too weak).

I’d boycott them just for that, but they’re also the corporation who in both U.S. and European hearings has argued that water isn’t a human right and pushed to privatise community resources, at a time when water scarcity is one of the main long-term threats to many countries, including the U.S. and many European countries.

Other companies do this stuff too, but generally speaking they’ve done it for less time and are less brazen about it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Lazylazycat@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Agreed. Fuck billionaires, fuck capitalism.

[-] EndOfLine@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

While I understand your perspective, you failed to mention their actions which specifically targeted new mothers in developing countries with unethical actions that resulted in the slow deaths of infants.

This is why I boycott Nestlé. Not poor treatment of employees, nor a disregard for the environment.

Nestlé implemented a plan that caused babies to die a slow and painful death while their mothers could only watch helplessly.

Fuck Nestlé.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1977_Nestl%C3%A9_boycott

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] TrenchcoatFullofBats@belfry.rip 30 points 1 year ago

Fun fact 1: That is Hayao Miyazaki of Studio Ghibli

Fun Fact 2: KitKat in Japan is made by Nestle, so he probably would be disappointed to find out that his KitKat is made by Nestle

[-] BraBraBra@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Not so fun fact:

He's a bit of a dick.

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Meh. He's a creative type with a high work standard. He's also pro socialism and sympathetic to workers.

Edit: citation https://walessince1945.wordpress.com/2020/11/11/hayao-miyazaki-the-miners-strike-and-wales/

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Nesquik@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago

I was given my alias at 8yo so I was ignorant at the time drinking nesquik everyday.

Fuck nestle.

[-] Bleach7297@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

I don't hold it against you. You're a victim in this!!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] famousringo@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago

Shouldn’t be hard, as almost everything Nestle makes tastes like crap.

[-] SuperLogica@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Maybe stop eating shampoo then. (= They partly own L’Oréal, and by extension all the L’Oréal brands: Garnier, Maybelline, Vichy, Biotherm, etc.)

To your actual point though: A) that depends on which country you live in, given that their products are manufactured differently in each country/region. B) it does also depend on what brand you’re referring to. I find it highly unlikely you dislike EVERYTHING in the Nestle machine. Hot Pockets? Perrier water? Nerds? Smarties??

[-] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I dont think that is true any longer. They had stock at one point in Loreal but it doesn't seem to be the current case when I tried researching it recently. A LOT of luxury salon hair brands are in the loreal umbrella like redken, biolage, and of course loreal.

Yeah and people act like nestle is just gross junk food. Coffee mate, Starbucks (packaged stuff sold in stores)

That said it was pretty easy for me to quit I only really had to replace a few things myself. Loreal would be way harder

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] atyaz@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago

Well that's subjective, but I see your point, there are definitely much higher quality products out there. But if you grew up with some of their products, there is the nostalgia factor, plus if you can't afford the higher quality products, you are still going to buy nestle products. You could say they have us by the balls.

[-] FarFarAway@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Definitely.

Obligatory, fuck nestle!

[-] vector@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

Speaking of which, have the hydrohomies migrated already?

[-] NekoKamiGuru@ttrpg.network 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That can be difficult in a small town where the only supermarket is supplied exclusively by a wholesaler who has a deal with Nestle. And ordering candy from Amazon will just mean you get melted and/or spoiled chocolate weeks after you order.

[-] schmorpel@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 year ago

It also means using Amazon which is not better than Nestle really

[-] Chadus_Maximus@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 year ago

If any of ya'll have some KitKat alternatives I'm listening. Currently enjoying Kinder Bueno but am ready for something else.

[-] sarsaparilyptus@lemmy.fmhy.ml 21 points 1 year ago

American Kit Kats are made by the Hershey company and no money goes to Nestlé.

Explanation:
Kit Kat used to be a Rowntree's product, and Hershey bought the right to make the candy in the U.S. in perpetuity back in 1970. When Nestlé bought Rowtree's, they had to abide by the contract to license out the Kit Kat for no royalties, because the only condition of the agreement is that Hershey loses the license if the company ever gets sold. And since selling the Kit Kat bar is so valuable, buying Hershey for what it's currently worth would mean instantly losing a large amount of Hershey's value, so even when they've tried to find a buyer, nobody will buy the company—even Nestlé refused to buy Hershey in 2002.

[-] EmiliaTheHero@possumpat.io 3 points 1 year ago

Does Nestlé see profits from the Ferrara distributed products (mainly Crunch bars)?

[-] Fester@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

If you’re in the US, KitKat here is made by Hershey.

But look at Nature Valley “Chocolate Peanut Butter Wafer Bars.” As someone who likes both, they’re not the same - they’re better, as long as you like peanut butter.

[-] ProvokedGamer@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

What about Canada? Is KitKat made by Nestle here?

[-] Fester@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Looks like it, unfortunately.

They also make Coffee Crisp, which is a shame, as I used to stock up on them whenever I visited.

[-] ProvokedGamer@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

No man, Coffee Crisp is my go to. I’m gonna have to find a new favourite :(

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] snarf@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

If you are in the United States, you are giving your money to Hershey for Kit Kat; it is licensed from Nestlé based on a previous deal with the original owner of the brand. I don't know the exact details of the contract, but it appears that it was a lump sum payment which means no money goes to Nestlé for Kit Kat sales in the US.

Still, Hershey is not much better, and this factoid is irrelevant if you are NOT buying the US version. Similar options include Tim Tam, Double Time, Dido, Trader Joe's Wafer Cookie, Milka Leo or Choco Wafer, Little Secrets Crispy Wafers, and any number of other generic chocolate wafers. You can also make your own: https://www.inthekitchenwithmatt.com/homemade-kit-kats.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] donut4ever@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

Man, we need cut a lot of things in our lives to stop supporting these assholes. They're like cancer, they're everything. Some things I literally just had to give up completely

[-] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 year ago
[-] nigh7y@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago
[-] vd1n@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Chew em up n rat em out.

[-] gunslingerfry@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

When you're eating a candy and look at the wrapper and it says "Great chocolate flavor." You can't call it chocolate unless it meets certain quality criteria.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
1813 points (97.4% liked)

Memes

44808 readers
2753 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS