202
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jacktherippah@lemmy.world 84 points 7 months ago

While it is annoying to people like you and me, this is a good thing for the average user. Your average downloads folder probably contains sensitive information that shouldn't be visible to apps. Same with Android/data. Locking it down is annoying for sure, but it's admittedly a good privacy&security measure.

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 18 points 7 months ago

If the average user was more occupied dealing with identity theft they'd have less time to spread misinformation on Facebook and Twitter.

[-] justJanne@startrek.website 11 points 7 months ago

Even if it's blocked for the average user, it'd still be awesome if we could circumvent it with adb. I've used KDE Connect to access my phone remotely for a long time, and now that feature is useless.

[-] TheMadnessKing@lemdro.id 6 points 7 months ago

Exactly.

I have often found malware apps with all sorts of permission on my relatives phones which suddenly started to lag alot. These folders can be easily exploited by malware apps, so its kinda good.

[-] Placid@lemmy.world 54 points 7 months ago

I THINK THIS HAS TO DO WITH APP PERMISSIONS. IF YOUR APP NEEDS A PLACE TO READ/WRITE FILES, IT MAKES SENSE TO KEEP IT OUT OF YOUR DOWNLOADS FOLDER THAT COULD CONTAIN SENSITIVE INFORMATION LIKE BANK STATEMENTS OR OTHER THINGS. YOU DON'T WANT SOME RANDOM APP LOOKING AT EVERYTHING THAT ENDS UP IN YOUR DOWNLOADS FOLDER!!!

GET RILED ABOUT GIVING THESE GREEDY DATA SNOOPING APPS THE LEAST PERMISSION POSSIBLE!!

[-] glimse@lemmy.world 42 points 7 months ago

The mildly infuriating part of this post is OP thinking that his consumer phone OS was made just for them and not millions of tech-illiterate people.

[-] glibg10b@lemmy.ml 17 points 7 months ago

I would be okay with an off button in the developer options, hidden from those people

[-] echo64@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago

Then, the scam apps will just come with instructions to turn that feature off

[-] Player2@sopuli.xyz 26 points 7 months ago

Well sounds like they didn't go far enough then, they should cut all internet access so that users don't accidentally download malicious apps!

A user that wants full control of their own device should have that option available. There is no good reason Android makes it difficult to access its data folder for example for users that do want to mess around with that stuff.

[-] echo64@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

I think there should be space for an i-know-what-im-doing. But I think we can all agree that limiting the damage that can be done to normal people who just want a device to do normal stuff on is a good thing.

This level of hyperbole isn't a useful discussion, and I would hope, would be left at reddit rather than infesting lemmy too.

[-] Player2@sopuli.xyz 7 points 7 months ago

Well for me it is not really that much of a hyperbole, I consider being able to access the files on your own device pretty much a necessity. Yes it is absolutely no problem that protections like this are enabled out of the box, but it should all be optional, even if that process is kind of difficult (disabling by connecting to a computer and doing some sort of configuration for example).

Maybe I'm just upset because an update recently broke Android/data access and forced me to look for a new workaround for 30 minutes (to access my own files on the device I supposedly own!)

[-] Knusper@feddit.de 6 points 7 months ago

You need to tap 7 times on a random UI element, deep down in a settings menu. There is no way any instructions could direct a non-techy to do that, even if the non-techy wanted to.

[-] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago

I was done when I saw all caps.

[-] glibg10b@lemmy.ml 14 points 7 months ago

I understand the security implications, but I think I should at least have a say about what happens on my own phone

The app in question is popular and open source. My SD card's downloads folder is also unused and empty, as you can see. There is absolutely zero risk here

[-] Nusm@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

But….. if you’re allowed to install into the downloads folder, then it wouldn’t be unused and empty….. ?

Is this Schrödinger’s file system?

[-] IlliteratiDomine@infosec.pub 2 points 7 months ago

OP isn't trying to install into the downloads folder; they're trying to grant an app access to the downloads folder to read and write data.

[-] Nusm@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

But..... if they write data into that folder, it wouldn't be unused and empty...... ?

Maybe I'm misunderstanding something here?

[-] glibg10b@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago

An app can't steal sensitive information from itself

[-] RogueBanana@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 months ago

Why not just state what the app is, would make a lot more sense when you make it clear why it is required

[-] Placid@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago

SOUNDS LIKE YOU NEED TO START DOWNLOADIN PICTURES OF MOTORCYCLES AND BAMS!

[-] deur@feddit.nl 42 points 7 months ago

Sounds like you're part of the group they're protecting if you refuse to understand and value the need for permission management ;)

Unlucky!

[-] bjorney@lemmy.ca 17 points 7 months ago

This is so every app can only read it's own subfolder. Unless you think it's better that advertisers and app developers can have access to 100% of your personal files

[-] oldGregg@lemm.ee 8 points 7 months ago

I wish I could at least create a folder on my microSD card for these apps but no.

[-] mojo@lemm.ee 13 points 7 months ago

There's nothing wrong with this lol

[-] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 12 points 7 months ago

You should definitely campaign against seatbelt laws

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 9 points 7 months ago
[-] kzhe@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago

Just curious, as a rooted phone user is there any way to force this to allow you to use downloads?

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 4 points 7 months ago

would you still be insulted if it said "only folders can be created in the root directory"?

[-] pbanj@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago

No storage restrictions.
Can remove it.
https://github.com/Xposed-Modules-Repo/com.github.dan.nostoragerestrict

Storage isolation.
More control over exactly what folders apps can see/use.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=moe.shizuku.redirectstorage

Shamiko.
One of my favorite magisk mods. It makes ot so apps in the deny list can still be messed with.
https://github.com/LSPosed/LSPosed.github.io/releases

[-] yessikg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 7 months ago

I was expecting an important folder but the Download folder???

[-] Gallardo994@sh.itjust.works 0 points 7 months ago

How is downloads folder not important? For most people this is literally the biggest folder of files containing everything they ever downloaded, and it may also include downloads from messengers, e.g. Whatsapp and Telegram.

[-] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago

You just answered your own question.

[-] ExtremeDullard 1 points 7 months ago

Many people protect themselves by limiting their own actions on purpose. For example: running programs as a normal users despite having root or administrator rights. It's good practice.

What you're complaining about is someone else limiting your actions for you. Unfortunately, that's the Android security model: the OS maker trusts itself but not the user.

If you're a knowledgeable and responsible computer user, you have to suffer this choice of security model for the good of everyone else who may not have your technical chops. That's how it is with Android.

If you don't like it, you'll have to hack into your own Android system (what most people do when they root their phone and install things to play hide and seek with applications that try to detect rooting), or come up with your own mobile OS that implements another security model and try to convince app vendors that your OS isn't a security liability.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
202 points (82.2% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

34384 readers
951 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS