I recommend teaching him that the social credit score only applies to the wealthy and draw parallels to the west's "social credit score"- credit scores.
chat
Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.
As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.
Thank you and happy chatting!
Tell her you’ve subtracted 300 points from her social credit score for being a liberal.
Instead of getting offended, maybe explain what it really is then? If the social credit context fits well with the use case you two were discussing, what is the issue with it being bought up? He insists it was real, but if its not then explain to him where he is wrong then?
I understand there's western propaganda, but if social credit really is not a thing then be patient and help to deprogram him
don't tell people not to be offended by bigotry directed their way. what the fuck is wrong with you?
Instead of getting offended
Other comrades are a bit hostile, understandable given how federated folks tend to engage. I'll try to have a good faith discussion since I have a decent amount of patience today, I can't write it all out so please mind that I'll have you do some of your own homework if you want to know what is genuinely true or false.
I linked this podcast in a comment to this post, here's a USian who is well versed in legal matters (he reads and interprets Chinese legal documents) who explains what the deal is with social credit.
he explained that the concept was already in his mind when he was thinking about the reputation system so it wasn’t just a reaction to Asia specifically.
To give him one minor defence, I also immediately thought social credit when I saw "reputation rating". I don't know your partner and I may have been primed by the thread title, but I can't say I wouldn't have said the same thing if my mind had already gone to that and you had said "this might be better suited to Asia" without explaining why. That comes with the qualifier that I am autistic and bad at interpretting subtext or implications face-to-face, so guessing what people are thinking and getting it wrong happens to me a lot, and I feel you would be aware he does it if it was.
he insisted that he knew social credit scores were a real thing.
Find out what he is specifically thinking of when he talks about social credit scores so you can debunk the relevent parts - There is an actual social credit system, but it almost certainly doesn't look like he thinks it does if he thinks "they're used to social credit scores". ~~Show him where he's mistaken speculation for facts (e.g there being an actual numerical score), compare and contrast specific elements to other country's systems, show him the difference between actual implementation and temporary local experiments or private implementations, and above all emphasise the racist elements of its presentation to the west - like it being an "asian" thing rather than Chinese specifically, that it's authoritarian rather than having 80% public approval and only 1% disapproval, and the massive exagerations of what it does and how wide spread it is.~~ Nvm I saw your comment about him not knowing what it is. Act dumb like abc said, and keep "that sounds kinda racist..." handy. If you're in contact with any family members still in China ask them about what effect it has on them to relay to him, too - If they do live somewhere with a program they've still probably been less effected by it than he has been by his regular credit score. Emphasise that they know less about it than him, and he doesn't know anything about it.
Do we finally have someone from that instance who doesn't just swallow the State Department line on AES?