209
submitted 1 year ago by maegul@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

I think I’ve settled on the latter. Disagreement is maybe best communicated by the absence of an upvote? And downvotes work best when they signal something that is just off base, and while not reportable, is not appreciated at a broad cultural level.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TeaHands@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

The only times I've really been downvoting is if someone is giving out completely incorrect information, like in a support thread or something, and confusing matters. It's not a personal judgement or anything, just trying to keep things clear for the person asking the question.

If I disagree with a comment, well no biggie. Sometimes it's worth discussing like adults and sometimes it's just a subjective opinion. If it's offensive, I'll report it and block the user.

[-] Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago

Depends on what kind of "I don't agree". If somebody asks for people's favorite food, I'm not going to dislike all other answers... But if it's a more serious question, and an answer just has a really bad take that I don't agree with, that's getting a dislike.

[-] doppelgangmember@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Sad part of the design is that I need to interact with a post to get it off my feed so if it's an some stupid meme or whatever i just downvote and move on to clear up all the repeats.

The setting is off by default but you turn on hide post after interaction in the settings.

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Downvote for bad technical advise, I think the person is a bad actor/bad faith argument, or if the person turns ~~hostile~~ to ad hominem attacks. I try not to downvote if I'm putting the effort into debating someone.

edit: for clarity

[-] GerryMandering@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I agree with this. If I'm scrolling through a Linux forum and someone is stating something demonstrably incorrect, I don't want someone to stumble on the post and run into difficulties so I always downvote that particular post and upvote the posts with the right answer.

Now, if I disagree with someone that's different.

Like if I'm in a thread about your favourite tv show, I don't downvote someone I disagree with because it's subjective. I might upvote the people I agree with, but it doesn't seem fair to downvote someone's opinion.

But some things are either right or wrong, and your example of bad technical advice is one such thing

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago

Downvotes = disabled on my instance

[-] maegul@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Haha yep.

And beehaw too. Wonder how many others.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ironcrotch@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago

More like get this shit outa here

[-] milicent_bystandr@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

I think someone else mentioned the same here, but as I've browsed down the opinions, I wonder if it's good for different communities to have their own subculture on what votes mean.

For sure, outsiders dropping by might vote 'counter-culturally' and unhelpfully, but you can get a general sense of understanding in a community.

For r/all-alike stuff I'm sure things are different.

[-] astroturds@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago

I only downvote hateful stuff or obvious bots and spam. The same as I do on anything with upvotes and downvotes.

[-] luthis@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 year ago

Upvoted. Feel bad that i disagree. 😵

[-] Zippy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I like it to gauge what the general consensus is. Agree or not.

[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I think of it like a digital facial expression. Upvoting is akin to smiling or conveying some other positive emotion like affirmation or understanding (even if the subject matter is inherently negative). Downvote is the opposite- someone says something irl that makes you frown or grimmace, or you know they're telling you a lie, your expression can convey that without a single word. Here, downvote.

There's no real etiquette - if you feel like you want to give an up or down vote, just do it and don't put too much thought into it.

[-] asparagus9001@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's weird how nobody ever goes off on these philosophical treatises about what a downvote is REALLY supposed to be for unless they copped a shit ton of downvotes for their awful takes

To quote the famed philosopher T. Soprano: "Alright, but you gotta get over it."

[-] maegul@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I don't that's entirely fair or true across the board. I haven't received a ton of downvotes or anything, but realised that I didn't know what to do with the downvote and that some were clearly using downvotes where I don't think I would have.

For my, it was more sympathetic. I was thinking about people who do get downvoted and whether I'm ok with that.

[-] CanadaPlus 2 points 1 year ago

The latter. If it's just disagreement a quick reply is best, and sometimes it gets worked out just fine.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
209 points (88.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43027 readers
1670 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS