140
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub 40 points 7 months ago

This is a positive regardless. Shaun king is a massive grifter.

[-] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 9 points 7 months ago

Yeah seriously, one less blowhard on blowhard isle.

[-] misterdoctor@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

I cannot believe he still has supporters.

[-] mokancan@infosec.pub 23 points 7 months ago

Meta suspended my personal account on FB just for posting that I was planning on leaving FB.

[-] ericisshort@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago

The ole “You can’t quit, you’re fired!” trick. Works every time.

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 13 points 7 months ago

Quite likely an intentional thing, like they found people saying they're leaving encourages others to leave. They might even view it like when reddit was blocking mentions of lemmy.

[-] Fitik@fedia.io 2 points 7 months ago

I mean you can say thanks to them for helping you then./jk

[-] Maeve@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago

Good. Welcome home.

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

Shaun King is not that great a guy himself. I wonder if he did something else that caused issues.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

this sounds like the more likely scenario.

[-] LukefromDC@kolektiva.social 4 points 7 months ago

@return2ozma In response to this, every Arab country should ban Meta from processing payments or selling ads within their borders.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Meta has banned social justice activist Shaun King from Instagram, and he claims his account was disabled because he posted support for Palestinians in the Israel-Hamas war.

King, known for his social media advocacy on movements such as Black Lives Matter, had a following of more than 5 million users before his account on the Meta-owned platform was removed on Christmas Eve.

“The account was disabled due to multiple instances of praise for designated entities in violation of our policies,” a Meta spokesperson wrote in an email.

The organization analyzed patterns of “heightened censorship” around content supporting Palestinians, citing user reports of Meta removing their posts or restricting their access to certain Instagram and Facebook features.

“I formally appealed the night of the suspension, but have also now retained attorneys to proceed with the Civil Rights Division of the legal team at Meta,” King wrote in an email to NBC News Tuesday.

In his Facebook statement, he wrote that he is “safe” and that he had hoped his Instagram platform would serve as a cover for Palestinians who “cannot afford to lose their accounts” by documenting their plight within Gaza and the West Bank.


The original article contains 611 words, the summary contains 194 words. Saved 68%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Tedesche@lemmy.world -5 points 7 months ago

I don't give a shit.

this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
140 points (87.6% liked)

politics

18601 readers
3594 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS