This was perfectly on topic. Seems this is a biased moderation here.
As an addition on the topic:
Modern slavery in China according to the human rights organization Walk Free
Since 2018, evidence of forced labour of Uyghur and other Turkic and Muslim majority peoples has emerged in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (Uyghur Region) [...] Forced labour imposed by private actors is also reported, in addition to forced marriage and organ trafficking, with vulnerability primarily driven by discriminatory government practices.
The 2023 Global Slavery Index (GSI) estimates that 5.8 million people were living in modern slavery in China on any given day in 2021 [...] This estimate does not include figures on organ trafficking, which evidence indicates does occur in China.
Forced labour is exacted by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) as a means of racial and religious discrimination; political coercion and education; and as punishment for holding views ideologically opposed to the state. It is reported alongside mass surveillance, political indoctrination, religious oppression, forced separation of families, forced sterilisation, torture, sexual violence, and arbitrary detention in so-called “re-education camps” within the Uyghur Region [...]
Forced labour is exacted under the guise of vocational training and poverty alleviation – a scheme promulgated by the CCP to raise living standards in “ethnic areas.”
Globally, an estimated 50 million people were living in modern slavery on any given day in 2021. This is nearly one in every 150 people in the world. Walk Free writes:
Modern slavery is hidden in plain sight and is deeply intertwined with life in every corner of the world.
This is about products from China, produced with forced labour in China, wrongfully labeled as 'Italian'.
And, yes, the conditions in the agri-sector might be bad, they must be improved, which is another reason why we need more transparency in supply chains.
... alle Waren aus China verbieten, die nachweislich nicht aus einem von Sklaverei betroffenen Teil des Landes kommt. Aber da wird sich vermutlich niemand herantrauen.
Das ist die Aufgabe u.a. eines Lieferkettengesetzes, wogegen nicht zuletzt China massiv lobbyiert.
Und ja, es gibt Arbeitsrechtsverletzungen in Europa auch, und das muss abgeschafft werden. Aber das hier ist etwas ganz anderes:
Schichten bis zu 20 Stunden, körperliche Misshandlungen durch die Wärter und sogar Vergewaltigungen. Wer die vorgegebenen Produktionsquoten nicht erfüllt habe, dem seien zudem die Nahrungsmittelrationen gekürzt worden.
Wie viele der Zwangsarbeiterinnen und Zwangsarbeiter aus dem „Kyohwaso Nummer 12“ einen frühzeitigen Tod starben, ist nicht bekannt. Sehr wohl jedoch erzählten die Insassen übereinstimmend, dass die Leichen der Lagertoten an einem nahegelegenen Berghang verbrannt wurden, ohne dass ihre Familien davon in Kenntnis gesetzt wurden.
„Einige Zeugen sagten uns, dass der Anblick des Rauchs von diesem Berg der stärkste Grund für sie war, unbedingt überleben zu wollen, um außerhalb des Lagers zu sterben“, sagt Aktivistin Hosaniak.
Yes, I agree. It's far from being perfect anywhere. I'd just say we shouldn't generalize. One thing we need is more transparency in our global supply chain I guess.
This is not about Italian tomatoes but Chinese. Working conditions in agriculture may be worse than in other sectors, but here we apparently deal with slave-like conditions in Chinese prison-factories. Just read my other comment in this thread or the whole article.
I also think that Italy delivers high quality products in a lot of industries, including in the food sector if I may say so. But this article is about China anyway in the first place.
Mamutjan, a Uyghur teacher who was imprisoned in 2015 for an irregularity in his travel documentation, says he was beaten for failing to meet the high tomato quotas expected of him.
“In a dark prison cell, there were chains hanging from the ceiling. They hung me up there and said ‘Why can’t you finish the job?’ They beat my buttocks really hard, hit me in the ribs. I still have marks.”
China Is Studying Russia’s Sanctions Evasion to Prepare for Taiwan Conflict -- (Archived link)
China has been supporting Russia’s economy since the start of the Ukraine war by buying its oil while supplying it with everything from microelectronics to washing machines.
Meanwhile, Beijing has been getting its own strategic benefit: a real-world case study in how to circumvent Western sanctions.
An interagency group, set up by China in the months following the full-scale invasion, has studied the impact of sanctions and produced reports regularly for the country’s leadership, according to people familiar with the matter. The goal is to draw lessons about how to mitigate them, particularly in case a conflict over Taiwan prompts the U.S. and its allies to impose similar penalties on China, the people said.
As part of the effort, Chinese officials periodically visit Moscow to meet with the Russian Central Bank, the Finance Ministry and other agencies involved in countering sanctions, the people said.
The Chinese study effort, which hasn’t previously been reported, is emblematic of the new age of economic warfare unleashed by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, where the lines between economic policy and geopolitical strategy are increasingly blurred. That trend is only likely to be amplified by Donald Trump’s second presidential term, where he plans to turbocharge the use of tariffs as a tool for negotiation and coercion.
Sowas funktioniert aber nur, wenn sich alle an die Regeln halten. Vor allem muss es dann auch Reziprozität geben. Von 'Open Science' will China meist nur dann etwas wissen, wenn es um ausländische Forschung geht. Bei eigenen wissenschaftlichen Arbeiten hat die chinesische Regierung eine ganz andere Sichtweise, da will man von 'open' meist nichts wissen. Ich habe das in Thread schon gepostet, aber hier passt es nochmal: Open Science Investigation
There is a thread to an article at https://feddit.org/post/5294871 that includes also images of the products, I added the link also in the body now.