[-] 8Bitz0@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 month ago

I’m pretty sure 95% of people don’t even know what Windows is. It’s just part of the computer to them.

[-] 8Bitz0@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 month ago

It’s so odd how proprietary software is frowned upon so much in this community, but no one cares when it comes to gaming.

[-] 8Bitz0@discuss.tchncs.de 35 points 1 month ago

i5 4790K and a… 7900 XTX?

[-] 8Bitz0@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 month ago

There’s nothing wrong with the software itself. It works great for what it does. On the other hand, it’s a compatibility layer, which always increases friction between things a little. I think the best use for this is running legacy software.

There aren’t many alternatives. Maybe in the future, we’ll see graphics API abstraction libraries like wgpu get used more. This gives developers a single API which can use DirectX on Windows, Vulkan on Linux, or Metal on macOS. This could allow support for entirely new graphics APIs without developers using it having to do anything.

Of course, that’s my opinion. People can build their software how they like.

[-] 8Bitz0@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 month ago

Until you actually try to use Vulkan on macOS. Since there’s no native support, you end up needing MoltenVK.

[-] 8Bitz0@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 months ago

Have an update that completely breaks everything on your system? Just revert to the previous image and it’s no problem.

These immutable distros have so much potential. Especially for the tech illiterate. I really encourage anyone who hasn’t yet to give them a shot.

Of course they aren’t for everybody, as it makes it far harder to make system-level changes on the local system.

171
[-] 8Bitz0@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 2 months ago

It’s likely many users still use Automator (which is from 2005). Removing it could break workflows for many people if removed. There’s a bunch of older apps in macOS like this. The latest version of macOS still has AirPort Utility, for example.

[-] 8Bitz0@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 4 months ago

This is common with these Linux on Android-based phones. I believe Ubuntu Touch requires you to downgrade to Android 9 in most cases.

[-] 8Bitz0@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 5 months ago

Great. Time to update Nginx on my vacuum.

[-] 8Bitz0@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 6 months ago

This is my complaint as well. KDE certainly has advantages and neat design ideas, but I always come across some major bugs that make my device unusable.

Definitely not saying GNOME doesn’t have bugs as well though.

[-] 8Bitz0@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 6 months ago

Rust is a memory-safe language. So in this case, it could result in more stable software.

[-] 8Bitz0@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 7 months ago

Not only that, you asked for their opinions.

24
submitted 1 year ago by 8Bitz0@discuss.tchncs.de to c/linux@lemmy.ml

Most settings applications (GNOME Settings, KDE Control Center) give very limited access to managing lower level components in the system. For example, kernel management, managing groups, etc.

If they did though, in your opinion, what would be the most effective way to offer a simple experience for some users, and more control for those who need it? How would most desktops implement this "hybrid" approach?

Or should users not be able to control those things graphically at all?

view more: next ›

8Bitz0

joined 1 year ago