Aceticon

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I can only comment on what I'm most familiar with.

I do hope there are places out there were people have better values than around here.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 13 hours ago

He's like a fucking chihuahua that barks at a random passerby on the street and then celebrates his "victory of making them leave" when that person simply doesn't give a shit and keeps walking.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I think merelly "spends more per-person" is nowhere strong enough to really illustrate how bad things are.

For example, the United States spends more than TWICE per-person in Healthcare than the United Kingdom.

In fact judging by this it spends almost twice as much as the European country which has a 69% higher GDP per-capita - Luxembourg.

And even with such much higher spending levels, based on this healthcare outcomes are actually worse.

Healthcare in the US is world-beating by a large marge in how spectacularly inneficient it is.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Trump wanted to fuck children but he couldn't go there to do it in person so he remotelly had them fucked in bulk.

If you don't think that's important enough to beat cancer research in getting funds then you're one of those people who doesn't want to make America great again.

/s

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

In a Universal healtcare system, there is a monetary incentive for the autorities to make laws and regulations to prevent disease - prevention is a lot cheaper than fixing things after the damage is done.

In a pure for profit healthcare system there is no such incentive for the autorities - in some ways, there might even be the opposite incentive, depending on the levels of Corruption and how much more profit the Healthcare sector can make if people are more sick: after all, when a country spends twice as much as a percentage of the GDP in Healthcare, that means there's a lot more money to be made in Healthcare, and private interests have an incentive to buy politicians and regulators to help them profit as much as possible.

Beyond this there is also the whole "doing what's best for our people" incentive, which is the US is so weak that it doesn't even apply to some obviously bad things (for example, easy availability of guns, which is definitelly bad for people's health) much less to more subtle pathways to damage people's health such as unhealthy food.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Two wrongs don't make a right.

If nothing happens that society and its practices will never change and the pain will continue.

If the whole castle of cards collapses due to this, whilst it's a small consolation for the current slaves given the pain they'll endure, it's way more pain spared for would be future slaves.

Further, the scumbags will definitelly lose if the whole slave-using realestate-bubble empire whose value supports their wealth collapses back to nomads camel fucking in the desert.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Most Western (can't speak for the rest) societies aren't trully Civilized and were maybe never so - they're just a bit less uncivilized than early XX century and before.

Further, we seem to have been devolving of in the last decades, moving away from Humanist values and increasingly embracing sociopatic inclinations as "our" values (Greed is good, Might makes right, measuring the worth of a person by their possessions and so on).

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

If you're hosting some other country's military bases you're either its Ally or its Vassal.

I can understand why they do it, but none the less there's no such thing as a free lunch.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

Shouldn't have been an ally of the US and Israel.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 20 hours ago

Number of captains who took his advice: 0

The power of this guy starts and stops with No-Brain individuals in America.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 20 hours ago

True.

The US is just even worse off in that regard because of the very high dependency (what I read in the Omnivore's Dilema was over 70%) of its food supply on hybrid corn.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

That's mostly a problem for countries were almost the entire food base is directly (food, food products, high-fructose corn syrup) and indirectly (chicken and cattle feed) hybrid corn which cannot be grown without fertilizer (as the plant density is too high for normal land to be able to support), i.e. the United States.

Other countries won't suffer quite as much.

 

So apparently for lemmy.world mods pointing out that the word "anti-semite" is far more used than "antigypsyism, anti-Romanyism, antiziganism, ziganophobia, or Romaphobia” even though the Nazis targetted both Jews and Roma in the Holocaust, is, somehow, "Criticizing Jewish people as a whole".

Or maybe it's the whole "I don't care about any one specific race, I care about people and think it's always unjusct when people are treated differently based on things they were born with, such as race" that was deemed "Criticizing Jewish people as a whole".

Good old lemmy.world: they were called on it repeatedly so eventually walked back on the whole "criticizing Israel is anti-semitic" but apparently if you don't go along with the view that racism against a very specific group is much worse than racism against people from other groups, then you must be against that specific ethnic group.

My comment in text for reference:

All clearly as frequently used as "anti-semitism" /s

And yeah, I don't care about race, any race, I care about people, which includes that they're not unjustly treated for things that were not their choice, such as the race they were born into.

It's Racists who feel the need to care about a race or races, defending things for some races which they do noit defend for others, doing little performances about how others must care about those races too and that those who don't "are against those races" - for them race comes first, defining a person and dictating how they should be treated.

For Humanists race is something that should be of as little importance to how somebody is treated as the color of their eyes or how tall they are, and yet they see again and again race weponized by Racists to treat people differently even though those people haven't actually earned such treatment through their actions: in other words race fro Humanists is something that should be irrelevant yet has been turned by others into a pivot for injustice.

It's pretty obvious from your little performance which one you are

view more: next ›