I think you mean opinionated headlines. But you're right. This post is trash. Disney did a bad thing, but it's nothing like what's in the post title (which isn't the article headline).
Disney is arguing the case should go to arbitration, not that it is legal for them to kill someone. Obviously their argument in arbitration would be that is isn't their fault the death occured.
When I was a child, I had a fever. My hands felt just like two balloons.
“I have little doubt that given my close relationship with my brothers, at some juncture, a lawyer or many lawyers will soon try to lump me in with the allegations against Alon and Oren,” Tal reportedly wrote in an email to colleagues[....]
Or, and this makes more sense, he had little doubt because he had also engaged in illegal activity.
Getting Maduro out would help Venezuela a lot. Sending Trump, not so much.
Second paragraph in the article listed:
boosted lies, coordinated harassment, and hateful memes
I bet they may have put more details in the article.
If inflation goes to zero, prices remain where they are.
Except it's the opposite? It's talking about inflation ending due to consumers.
Doesn't that just mean there were more ties due to an evenly divided Senate?
Considering he's still talking about Biden so much, I think you're probably right.
"Iran, if you're listening, release the n-word tapes!"
Is Disney arguing this should go to binding arbitration and that they are not at fault for the death, or are they arguing that it is legal for them to kill people whose families had Disney+ trials?
It's fine to have your own strong opinion on this case, but you can't have your own facts.