BaumGeist

joined 3 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] BaumGeist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

It already is. Every site either serves economic interests or is so full of outrage-addicted doomers that it's useless trying to find something engaging and enjoyable anymore. It's time to come up for air irl, touch some grass, and work on finding solutions to a dead internet. See you on the other side

[–] BaumGeist@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nothing that I found particularly cinematic. It's an entertaining story, and moving at times, but it doesn't really stand out from any generic war/action movie. Would I watch it again? Probably not, but would I recommend watching it at least once? Also no. But do I regret watching it and wish I could have 2 hours of my life back because I resent listening to my friend who recommended it and now think much less of their taste in media for thinking so highly of such a mediocre formulaic slop that could have been shat out by chatGPT? Not me!

[–] BaumGeist@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Just saw Red Dawn. The idea of WW3 just happening so quick you don't realize is so real: no one expects war to break out in their back yard, it's something that happens elsewhere that you're conscripted into... until it isn't, and suddenly you're doing your best to just survive as everyone you know and love dies around you. You weren't trained for this. Since the 1950s, America has been constantly on the brink of WW3, picking as many fights as they can; it's incredibly prescient, as much so now as it was then.

But the movie instead relies too much on "BOOO HISSS EVIL, LYING, JOYLESS COMMIES," only occasionally coming close to getting it: actually, they're just like us. Like every other American war movie, it's basically defanged of an accurate portrayal of war so that instead it can be a "YAY Patriotism!" story. Even the ending wraps, after watching all but 2 of the main characters get killed while fighting for their freedom and survival, with the conclusion that they "died so that this nation shall not perish from the Earth."

And yes, I get the reference... It's still nationalist propaganda no matter how famous the speech was.

War movies piss me off so much in general. War is an incredibly interesting topic, and we have so much to learn from it... And yet the majority of stories told about it seem to center around superhuman feats of combat and how great We™ are and how evil They™ are, and so few actually seem to really portray it for what it is:

a bunch of pretentious apes brainwashed into thinking the others are soulless monsters, while they have more in common with each other than with the pack leaders who pretend to be on their side (so that they can stay safe and comfortable while the grunts do all the dying for their greed).

[–] BaumGeist@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

IANAWP (I Am Not A Web Programmer), but

Since the constructor calls load, shouldn't load create a session if one doesn't exist? Meaning if the SessionId cookie isn't already set, it should set one instead of just returning nothing?

[–] BaumGeist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is your phone running a GNU distro or rooted Android, or is it just regular Android with a Termux chroot?

[–] BaumGeist@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Jurassic World. Just give me 90 minutes of dino mutants fighting, I don't give a shit about Chris Pratt nor some random kids.

[–] BaumGeist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

You take that back about The Man From Earth. It left nothing wanting in execution.

[–] BaumGeist@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

I don't want a remake, I want a sequel. I'm glad I'm not the only one who disliked the visuals of the movie, tho.

[–] BaumGeist@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think the execution was amazingly well done. It's one of the best character driven horror-thrillers I've ever seen, all the characters are memorable and well-rounded, the premise is explored as much as it needs to be, and it doesn't really leave any loose ends. 9/10 movie for sure

[–] BaumGeist@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago (9 children)

100% agree. It's a fine twist on the subgenre, but the twist introduces an idea that begs to be expanded upon as part of a larger, cross-subgenre arc. And yet we only get a sliver and then it's done.

My hot take is that Joss Whedon's writing is like JJ Abrams': perfect premises with bad sense of follow-thru, so all their work gets the Netflix "over before it's satisfyingly concluded" treatment

[–] BaumGeist@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

When I am ill with an infection, I care not that "Not All Bacteria" cause the illness, I still take antibiotics all the same. If I have cancer, I do not give a shit that Not All Cancer Cells will destroy my organs, I still seek chemotherapy.

Capitalism is entirely a human invention, and the most widely adopted ideology. I care not that "capitalism is the problem" because if humans can't get their shit together, then they are the root cause of the problem and Capitalism is just another symptom.

Put another way, in the words of Jesus Christ (paraphrased): "Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow: they don't destroy their home and then pretend like they aren't the problem because 'Lily Capitalism is the actual problem'"

Oh, btw: Misanthropy != Fascism. Ecofascism is a belief that all people should stick to their racially segregated "homelands" and live in harmony with nature. Whatever people who say "'Humans are a virus' is literally ecofascist rhetoric" believe it to be may be the actual solution to the oncoming apocalypse we've gotten ourselves into. I'm a misanthrope who loves the biosphere more than humanity's right to do whatever it wants and get away with it because "it's the ideology, not the people who participate in the ideology." I'm not a fucking racist.

339
Bruleain (lemmy.ml)
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by BaumGeist@lemmy.ml to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 
 

Finally, another web engine is being developed to compete with Chromium and Firefox (Gecko), and they're also working on a browser that will use it.

Here's the maintainer talking about the current state of the project, and a demo of the current functionality

 

I occasionally see love for niche small distros, instead of the major ones...

And it just seems to me like there's more hurdles than help when it comes to adopting an OS whose users number in the hundreds or dozens. I can understand trying one for fun in a VM, but I prefer sticking to the bigger distros for my daily drivers since the they'll support more software and not be reliant on upstream sources, and any bugs or other issues are more likely to be documented abd have workarounds/fixes.

So: What distro do you daily drive and why? What drove you to choose it?

 
 

test

 

It's the series finale for our friend Plague Roach. Big props to Drue for all the work he's put into this project

Here's the full series playlist on youtube

 
 

I've been using nala on my debian-based computers instead of apt, mostly for the parallel downloads, but also because the UI is nicer. I have one issue, and that's the slow completions; it's not wasting painful amounts of time, but it still takes a second or two each time I hit tab. I don't know if this is the same for all shells, but I'm using zsh.

I tried a workaround, but it seems prone to breaking something. So far it's working fine for my purposes, so I thought I'd share anyway:

  1. I backed up /usr/share/zsh/vendor-completions/_nala to my home directory
  2. I copied /usr/share/zsh/functions/Completion/Debian/_apt to /usr/share/zsh/vendor-completions/_nala
  3. I used vim to %s/apt/nala/g (replace every instance of 'apt' to 'nala') in the new /usr/share/zsh/vendor-completions/_nala

Already that's sped up the completions to seemingly as fast as any other command. And already I can see some jank peaking through: zsh now thinks nala has access to apt commands that it definitely doesn't (e.g. nala build-dep, nala changelog and nala full-upgrade), and it has lost autocompletions for nala fetch and nala history.

Once I understand completions files syntax better, I'll fix it to only use the commands listed in nala's manpage and submit a pr to the git repo. In the meantime, if anyone has suggestions for how to correct the existing completions file or more ways to make the _apt completions fit nala, it'd be much appreciated.

 

As a user, the best way to handle applications is a central repository where interoperability is guaranteed. Something like what Debian does with the base repos. I just run an install and it's all taken care of for me. What's more, I don't deal with unnecessary bloat from dozens of different versions of the same library according to the needs of each separate dev/team.

So the self-contained packages must be primarily of benefit to the devs, right? Except I was just reading through how flatpak handles dependencies: runtimes, base apps, and bundling. Runtimes and base apps supply dependencies to the whole system, so they only ever get installed once... but the documentation explicitly mentions that there are only few of both meaning that most devs will either have to do what repo devs do—ensure their app works with the standard libraries—or opt for bundling.

Devs being human—and humans being animals—this means the overall average tendency will be to bundle, because that's easier for them. Which means that I, the end user, now have more bloat, which incentivizes me to retreat to the disk-saving havens of repos, which incentivizes the devs to release on a repo anyway...

So again... who does this benefit? Or am I just completely misunderstanding the costs and benefits?

 

Most people are aware that gasoline sucks as a fuel and is responsible for a large portion of carbon emissions, but defenders love to trot out that "if every end consumer gave up their car, it would only remove like 10% of carbon emissions"

I can find tons of literature about the impact gasoline vehicles have, but is there any broader studies that consider other factors—like manufacture, maintenance, and city planning—while exploring the environmental and/or economic impact of cars and car culture?

I know there's great sources that have made these critiques, but I'm looking for scientific papers that present all the data in a single holistic analysis

view more: next ›