BranBucket

joined 3 years ago
[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago

He looks like a shitty render out of a lousy Half-Life clone.

[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago
[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Underrated point. Someone always brings up the cost of bikes in these threads and it's silly. Sure, some hard core cyclists will put $20k into the hobby, but it's not at all necessary.

I've got maybe $1200 in my total set up, and I could have done it far cheaper if I'd been picky about shopping sales and buying used.

The bike was around $750 new, $80 for an ergonomic saddle (saves on padded shorts, but YMMV), $60 for a helmet that fits well, $100 for pedals with toe clips so I can wear street shoes, and a few accessories here and there.

I put in 30-50 miles a week on average and I've had the bike for better than 2 years with no major mechanical issues. I don't know where that puts me in terms of milage over the average cyclist, but I have a great time and get plenty of exercise without breaking the bank.

[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I wonder if you could produce fairing kits for common recumbent bikes and split the difference.

[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago

Wealth doesn't necessarily exclude them from being MAMILs, but from what you've described, it seems there are plenty of other reasons to ride solo.

[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Sounds like you've encountered MAMILs in the wild.

Middle Aged Men In Lycra.

I like to point out that a 10k bike is really just a cheaper mid-life crisis than a sports car, tends to shut down the conversation one way or another pretty quick.

[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I have a bunch too, but the collection started by accident.

I like Godzilla. I like the old movies, I like the new ones. He's a giant radioactive lizard, what's not to like? I'm not a superfan, but I enjoy the franchise(s).

I'm supposedly hard to buy for, I think mostly because my interests lie outside the rest of the my family's to an extent, and tend to be niche or technical in nature, so I get Godzilla swag and toys for Xmas and birthdays. I don't mind, it's fun.

[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Slapping a shitty coat of paint over a complex and long-standing problem and claiming it's fixed is an apt metaphor for the last 250 years...

[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I like to put the phone to my ear like it's a voice call, then pretend to accidentally hang up, then refuse to answer again, then stop responding to texts.

[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago

this is an aircraft older than the typical US senator

Let's not get too hasty, the B-52H variant was first produced in 1961, making it 65 years old. A 65 year old incumbent senator still has three, maybe four good decades left in office...

[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, I know, but dude, there's a duck in it!

 

First, forgive me for a mostly political post, and if political discussions aren't welcome I have to problems deleting this.

I live in a highly conservative, sports loving area and I'm tired of listening to all the obviously insincere hand wringing and lies about safety and trans athletes in women's sports. Sometimes, changing the subject or leaving isn't an option, sadly. I was hoping you all could give me a little advice on how to respond as I'm tired of being silent.

Instinctively, I want to try and derail these arguments by suggesting that collegate and youth sports implement something like the "red stripe" rule from youth football. In pee wee football, if a player is growing faster than their peers then their helmet is marked with a red stripe and they're no longer allowed to carry the ball or play certain positions. This is both for handicap and safety reasons.

And just to be clear, I think the safety/unfair advantage argument is bullshit.

However, suggesting a red stripe rule could be a way to answer that argument without conceding their point and move a debate on to other topics. If a bigot still wants to press the sports issue, they're have to find other reasons to do so, and likely have to reveal their prejudice more openly.

But, I'm hesitant to use this argument, because at its core, such a rule still singles out trans athletes. So while it seems like a great debate tactic, I can still see how it could come across as offensive and transphobic, despite my intentions.

I don't like the idea of simply dismissing the issue as only affecting a tiny percentage of the population because that, to me, shouldn't matter.

So, what approach would be best? How would you all respond in this situation? How can I speak out on your behalf without speaking over you or for you?

view more: next ›