BranBucket

joined 3 years ago
[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Slapping a shitty coat of paint over a complex and long-standing problem and claiming it's fixed is an apt metaphor for the last 250 years...

[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I like to put the phone to my ear like it's a voice call, then pretend to accidentally hang up, then refuse to answer again, then stop responding to texts.

[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

this is an aircraft older than the typical US senator

Let's not get too hasty, the B-52H variant was first produced in 1961, making it 65 years old. A 65 year old incumbent senator still has three, maybe four good decades left in office...

[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I know, but dude, there's a duck in it!

[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 57 points 1 week ago (2 children)

49 year old dude here, skilled labor job, gruff, grungy, rough around the edges, etc. etc.

I would fucking love these. I'd show every single one of them off to my coworkers and talk about how damn cool they are. This is spousery at its finest.

Anyone who sees something wrong with this is just a jealous, insecure asshole.

[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

There are so, so many people these days who would have been much better off if they'd just shut up and fucked off to enjoy their fame and money.

Guliani, Musk, the idiot this headline refers to, Tim Allen, Roseanne Barr, Kevin Sorbo... etc. etc. on and on and on. I'm sure I'm forgetting another dozen or so examples.

If all of these people had just stayed out of it, kept a low profile, and just not said the quiet part out loud, they'd all still have a legacy and probably still be on Trump's good side. But they just can't do that. It's pathological.

Edit: The MAGAts will only like them as long as there's not a more successful celebrity who backs Trump. The support they get from his cult is as a consolation prize. It's not recognition of their achievements or talent, it's just for being someone who says nice things about their guy.

[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I am so very tired of every politician running on being a successful businessman. Government doesn't exist to turn a damn profit. All "businessman" means is that they'll continue to sell us out to their buddies.

And no, his voters didn't expect it to turn out this way. They thought they were part of the club. They expected to be invited to the party, rather than just footing the bill. Now that it's clear they won't be, all the GOP can offer them is punishing people they hate. And for far too many of them, that's still enough justification to win their support.

[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Turning the nation into one big company town/store.

Can't wait to be paid in scrip that's only redeemable at subsidiaries of the multinational corp. I work for.

[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

If it hasn't been made clear that you can essentially buy an election by now...

Not that his voters don't bear some of the blame, but money helped put him in power and helped keep him there because he was profitable.

These days everything is about money, except money, which is about power.

[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What damn good is power if you spend your golden years grinding yourself into an undead shell?

I mean, yeah, I get that this is pathological on some level. But I'll never understand why you wouldn't have an exit strategy that allows you to enjoy the fruits of destroying a nation for at least a few years.

[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

You know what I want to do when I'm 84? Nap. Look at pictures of my grandkids and shit. Not be in any form of legislature.

But, because this fucking ghoul can't understand the appeal of properly enjoying the last years of your life, the rest of us will probably have to work ourselves to death so that he can die while still being in control of the country and make a bunch of other sociopathic asshats money.

Fuck you, Mitch. I hope it's painful and slow.

[–] BranBucket@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

As much as I want to say this isn't true, I really can't.

 

First, forgive me for a mostly political post, and if political discussions aren't welcome I have to problems deleting this.

I live in a highly conservative, sports loving area and I'm tired of listening to all the obviously insincere hand wringing and lies about safety and trans athletes in women's sports. Sometimes, changing the subject or leaving isn't an option, sadly. I was hoping you all could give me a little advice on how to respond as I'm tired of being silent.

Instinctively, I want to try and derail these arguments by suggesting that collegate and youth sports implement something like the "red stripe" rule from youth football. In pee wee football, if a player is growing faster than their peers then their helmet is marked with a red stripe and they're no longer allowed to carry the ball or play certain positions. This is both for handicap and safety reasons.

And just to be clear, I think the safety/unfair advantage argument is bullshit.

However, suggesting a red stripe rule could be a way to answer that argument without conceding their point and move a debate on to other topics. If a bigot still wants to press the sports issue, they're have to find other reasons to do so, and likely have to reveal their prejudice more openly.

But, I'm hesitant to use this argument, because at its core, such a rule still singles out trans athletes. So while it seems like a great debate tactic, I can still see how it could come across as offensive and transphobic, despite my intentions.

I don't like the idea of simply dismissing the issue as only affecting a tiny percentage of the population because that, to me, shouldn't matter.

So, what approach would be best? How would you all respond in this situation? How can I speak out on your behalf without speaking over you or for you?

view more: next ›