Candelestine

joined 2 years ago
[–] Candelestine@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That's very unfortunate. For most of us, misleading clickbait is a mild inconvenience. For you, its real disappointment.

You should really implement a strict policy of not clicking clickbait titles. While this would remove your ability to read 75% of news, it would probably help a lot in the sanity dept.

I generally don't click it myself, and it does help. The algorithm will slowly pick up that you are uninterested in them.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago

It'd still irritate them due to the connotations, regardless of how legally actionable their irritation would be.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We'd just get a new one made out of water vapor. I'm sure everything would be fine.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago (4 children)

You know, everyone should start calling the service twiX, just to irritate the candy bar company, which is actually a multi-billion dollar conglomerate that does care how its brands are perceived.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I mean, it's not a fever. It's just sitting under a big pile of invisible blankets. Get rid of the blankets and things would be fine.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago

Call up your local news station and newspaper, offer them the story. If they turn you down, call up another one.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yet despite the clear creation of echo chambers, which I think is inevitable given how freedom of association works so smoothly and easily online, the Fediverse forces them all to "live next to each other".

It's not an entirely separate service I need to go on if I want to see what all the Nazi kids are up to these days.

This forced adjacency and inability to create any blocks stronger than defederation (which is pretty weak, really, compared to what other services can do) is going to have overall beneficial effects in the long-run, I think. Though it'll certainly cause its fair share of headaches too.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.ca 43 points 2 years ago

This is underrated. I actually close Lemmy a lot easier and more quickly than I did reddit, it's not hooking me with dopamine hits nearly as strongly.

As a result, since I know I'll probably just scroll for a few minutes at a time, I'm more willing to check in more often and toss a few upvotes and maybe a comment or two around.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I disagree with what you say, but will defend to death your right to say it. If you don't hear that often, find better friends.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

I can agree with and support that. I would not extend that boycott to trying to silence other individuals though. I'd prefer to try to convince them.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

When that opinion is shutting down dialogue, cowardly avoidance and censorship, it becomes a far dumber opinion than anyone else's.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago

Sure, that's fine and good, dialogue to your hearts content. But don't think fixing them is our job. Only war could save the Uyghurs, providing it did not go nuclear. And fighting a war against China is dangerous..

Their entire race is, unfortunately, dead men walking and there's not a damn thing we can do about it. China simply does not have to listen to our wishes. We need to worry about our people, not policing the rest of the world.

view more: ‹ prev next ›