Corgana

joined 2 years ago
[–] Corgana@startrek.website 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I thought this was going to be a video essay on Star Trek Phase II but I was pleasantly surprised Smiling

It doesn't meet the definition of "developing nation" either.

To be clear- this is just your personal "vibe" and not an actual fact, because the term "third world country" literally means a country that is not aligned with the US or USSR. If you meant "developing nation" that term also has a definition the US does not meet.

Is this just your vibes or do you have a source? Because I just checked the website of the organization this article is referencing and it says no such thing.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

First of all, that's not what "Economic Freedom" means in the context of democracy, but more importantly "economic freedom" is not even a factor in the methodology used by the group this article is citing.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Healthy for Lemmy, totally catastrophic for Pixelfed.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 4 points 1 week ago

You sir, are worse than Hitler.

 
[–] Corgana@startrek.website 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I know this comment is satire (well done... I think) but I want you to it hurt me deep in my bones.

Cheers

I'm clearly not paying enough for a therapist.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 4 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Plot twist: the kidnapper loves Star Trek but takes the opposite "Dear Doctor" position as you.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Then moderators make many stupid rules to try to increase quality and overmoderation takes hold

This is so true. One of the best decisions I made during my tenure as mod of /r/StarTrek was changing the rules to be spirt-based instead of language-based. People will literally try to lawyer their way around the language of any rule, and it leads to mod burnout when they are getting drawn into rules-debates when it's obvious the person is just trying to get around the spirit of the community's purpose.

For example we had a rule that was literally just "be nice". There's no wriggling around that because it's not some legal text. If someone is ""concerned"" about a request to "be nice" or "be honest", they are not someone we wanted to be around anyway. These are discussion communities, not civil society, not everyone has a right to participate in every single one of them.

As you said the beauty of the fediverse is that each instance can have it's own preferred method of discussion.

 
 
 

Very cool to see this topic in a place like Forbes, IMO.

 

From @nocontexttrek@mastodon.social

 
view more: next β€Ί