I think I get what the article is saying, but all I can imagine is Siri calmly reading to me the vilest insults ever written.
First rule of SETI: It can't be aliens until it can't be anything else.
I fed it a pre-HRT pic and got "Woman, 56% confident". Lol. I guess it's kind of affirming to think a machine could see the real me back then?
So the key to your product's success is limiting the number of people who can buy it. That's some interesting logic.
They're not fiction, but two that work for me are Great British Bake-Off and Taskmaster. The people on GBBO are so positive and helpful, it's a welcome change from American cooking competitions. Taskmaster is creative and silly, always good for a laugh.
Second the recommendation of Ted Lasso. Ted is a wonderful example of a person who doesn't understand something, knows he doesn't understand, but his heart is in the right place and he wants to learn.
ChatGPT is famous for hallucinating answers to factual questions. And they used it anyway? Day by day, the risk of AI killing us all is paling in comparison to the risk of stupid humans killing us all using AI.
Good news: smaller pieces burn up much easier in the atmosphere, so in the case of an actual asteroid deflection it's still a net gain.
Bad news: more potential navigation hazards.
I think that's a fair trade.
He could say anything was found, and he could actually believe it. None of that matters without physical evidence.
Or they won't. Facts and reality haven't been part of Republican messaging for a while now.
An actual fistfight on the House floor would be a pretty sad state of affairs, and not at all something to be celebrated, yet part of me is kind of hoping to see it.
Just a few more steps and she'll be saying "are these trans people even people anyway?"
If you are covering the cost of estrogen for "biological females" but not for "biological males" (as my shitty insurance tells me), that is discrimination on the basis of sex. This is not difficult.