DauntingFlamingo

joined 2 years ago
[–] DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I think you are vastly overestimating the productivity of renewables right now. They are a smart investment to augment what we have, but to take non-renewables offline and to build enough renewables to reach the levels of modern nuclear, we will need an additional decade... Assuming the tech in renewables continues to make massive gains. There just aren't enough skilled workers, and you can't run these people non-stop to produce enough windmills to meet demand.

Renewables are only 20% of the US total, nuclear is 18% (and the US is the highest producer of nuclear worldwide at 30% of the world's total), and the remaining ~60% is fossil fuels.

https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=427&t=3

[–] DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"I am not mad at you. This is not your fault. I am upset at the situation, and I am having trouble controlling myself. I apologize if I sound crazy or have upset you with my words and actions."

[–] DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml 25 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (18 children)

It takes 6 years on a fast paced build. If we had started when we knew of the problem, we could have avoided some of the problem. It is the only energy source we can scale up in that way, however. Every other energy source takes longer for less yield with current technology.

[–] DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

My city doesn't allow big trucks on our roads. The wear and tear of roads is heavily dependent on weight, as you and I both stated. Weighing 3500lbs more (the weight of a Toyota Camry) than even the largest personal vehicle is a problem which I hope they solve soon.

I'm not sure why people think it's propaganda that EVs weigh 1.5x or more than a standard sedan. It's a fact, and it's easy to find information. The tech crowd wants to call anything that hurts their opinion bullshit, but they refuse to look it up. It's right there on the manufacturers' websites. I sincerely doubt the owners of Rivian or Tesla are in on some government "propaganda" to lower their own sales.

I appreciate the votes. That proves you read the comment but have no idea how to respond, because you can't.

[–] DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I don't think it's propaganda that EVs are heavy as shit for their size. Automakers are really upfront on that fact. You trying to call it propaganda illustrates your bad faith argument. You're misusing that word and diluting the meaning.

4400 vs 5800 isn't much of a difference, considering the sizes of the vehicles you listed. You are essentially driving a midsize truck but without the utility of a truck. Your neighbor has two trucks to your one. The top trim Tacoma weighs the same as your lower tier Tesla. Tesla Model X Standard Range comes in at 5,185 pounds.

I think we can both agree your vehicle is extremely heavy for being a small, low/mid tier passenger vehicle. Some Teslas are not eligible for the $7500 tax credit because they weigh so much.

I like how you can't respond to this. It really hammers home my argument and calling you on your bullshit. Thank you for the votes, because that means I know you read the comment but have no idea how to respond!

[–] DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

Those trucks/SUVs weigh 8500lbs. Since there is no fuel tax being collected, these monsters are destroying the roads and not contributing to their upkeep. My city is passing laws to significantly increase the registration on these vehicles, according to their annual mileage. I'm all for going electric, but an 8500lb truck is not helping the environment

[–] DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

Escanaba In Da Moonlight

[–] DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Understandable!

[–] DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1989_Tiananmen_Square_protests_and_massacre

"At the State Council press conference on 6 June, spokesman Yuan Mu said that "preliminary tallies" by the government showed that about 300 civilians and soldiers died, including 23 students from universities in Beijing, along with some people he described as "ruffians".[229][238] Yuan also said some 5,000 soldiers and police were wounded, along with 2,000 civilians."

300 dead and 7,000 wounded sure soundss like a massacre

[–] DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah but praetorians historically loved installing new leaders via assassination

[–] DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

Where's your knowledge of current events led you man? That was struck down by the Republican dominated Supreme Court. Biden fought hard to get it that far, and his attempts fall in line with the original HEROS Act of 2003. It was the conservatives who robbed you of student loan forgiveness, not Biden

[–] DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Read in Morgan Freeman's voice.

view more: ‹ prev next ›