NEC corridor is not high-speed. The end-end average speed is only 70mph, which is pretty middling even for conventional rail.
DrunkEngineer
Jurado's web page states: "She focuses on expanding affordable housing, ending homelessness, supporting small businesses, tackling the climate crisis, and building a more just economy for all."
And then the Supreme Court will overturn...Checkmate.
LOL..the support pillars are not that large. This is just concern-trolling on the part of Nimbys.
Business owners are also sending threatening letters to bike lane supporters.

Many parts of Canada have all-ages requirement for helmets even for regular bikes. This is one main reason why Canada has atrocious mode-share for cycling.
99% of cycling head injuries are caused by cars. You helmet promoters can't see the forest for the trees.
A lot of the FAA fee is used to fund the various airport facilities, so yes it does make sense to charge on per-passenger basis.
On what grounds?
That it is bad for Republicans.
The Supreme Court will block this.
Auto industry spends over $12 billion per year just within the US. That money is to buy positive news coverage, which is why the media will never describe driving as being inherently unsafe.
According to the bog-standard UIC definition, HSR requires dedicated HSL running generally at 155+mph. UIC has a second definition that does allow for upgraded conventional lines running generally at 125mph in corridors without air competition. Acela meets neither of these metrics.
Even aside from the air competition issue, Acela's general overall speed is not over 125mph or even 100mph due to all the slow sections. For example: