That's an incentive to hire everyone in one hemisphere, unless we're talking about a world wide company that needs people in multiple times zones.

You claimed you provided it, but did not.

I know this is just a joke, but I'm reading a book on quitting right now and one of the points she is driving home is that if you quit at the right time, it tends to feel too early to quit.

College is still worth it for most people.

Now let's all get a good laugh at the "irony" while I'm downvoted by a bunch of liberals in the comments section of a submission about how liberals just follow the facts and objective reasoning.

I'm glad I was able to be part of it then. Lol

None of what you provided says anything about presidential elections.

so covers a lot of the vital information you’d want

No, it covers none of the information I want. Thats my point. They use deception and leave a similar open question as the other title to get you to click, the other title just leaves an open question to get you to click the link (although, to be fair, it would be a lie because I would not be surprised by it. Lol).

Both your title and the title that was use require you to click on the link in order to have any idea of what happened. The difference is that the real title misrepresents what actually happened to get you to do so. I would still rank it as worse.

Which has precisely zero to do with the submission.

Wouldn't be a Lemmy post if it weren't for someone shitting on America or Americans even when the story has nothing to do with America.

The headline implies a lot of people were laughing at her, at least that was my first impression. When it was really just one guy who gave a brief chuckle at her question. Considering the "laughing" is such a tiny part of what happened, I feel the opposite and it would be tough to make it more clickbait-y.

So, it didn't solve the problem? I'm not sure what you're driving at here. I'm not saying there shouldn't be multiple parties, I'm saying the vote during our presidential election, under our current system, is a strategic one, not one to throw away on a third party.