I strongly disagree. Atheism is explicit lack of faith.
For all practical purposes, an atheist thinks that without evidence, it's safe to assume that there's no god or gods.
Would you say that you're genuinely completely agnostic in relation to every single religion that has ever existed, even the joke religions (like the flying spaghetti monster, etc)?
If you asked me what my religion is, I would answer that you have already pre-supposed that I have one. Even though I would know what you're actually asking, I would answer that way to bring more popularity to the idea that not having a religion is normal. Yeah I know, I'm fun at parties.
People get very caught up in the definition of atheist and agnostic. It can mean very different things to different people.
Technically atheist is "without belief", and agnostic is "without knowledge".
Way to go, keep it up and you'll get there! 💪
Rancher desktop on Windows has done well enough as a replacement for docker desktop for me
What YAML does Terraform use? HCL is similar but different enough to YAML.
Linux mint is a pub of some type of some type of some type of...
You'll find that under settings -> customise -> swipe address bar sideways to switch tabs
Changing your user agent will not stop you being tracked. Browser fingerprinting can work with heaps of different signals, and is very difficult to block.
Also replied to another comment, sounds like this one here: https://opensourcesecurity.io/2024/04/01/xz-bonus-spectacular-episode/
I don't think there is anything "militant atheist" in the post you replied to.
I also consider myself a secular humanist, but would never describe myself as religious.
I think that normalising not having a religion would help to bring tolerance for people who have differing opinions, while calling secular humanist a religious view may reinforce a bias in some people that "you can't be good without religion".