Of it drags long enough european heavy industry would become non viable economically. That means nato is efectivley done for. No industrial base no war making capacity.
Farman
joined 3 years ago
I responded that because we were talking abaut protection of ethnic cleansing as justification for a state. And if that is the justification for israel do not necessarily disagree. I do not think the jews should be ethnically clensed and if they need their own state to prevent it im fine with that. I do strongly object to it being in the middle east.
And im aware that the zionist movment started much before ww2 and that nazis edit: (sorry for the incomplete post) were suporting it. And this makes the argument that israel is neccesary to protect the jews a lot weaker. But its ultimatley irrelevant to the abstract idea that a good justification for the state is as a means to prevent ethnic cleasning.
Can-ada does this shit all the time (harboring criminals while kidnaping inocent people) but everyone has been too cowardly to respond, the iranians, the chinese, all cowards. Its about time somebody did something about can-ada.
So yhea mody may be an asshole but at least he is a verebrate asshole. So that puts him in the top 10 world leaders in my book.
Well ultimatley legitimacy is subjective. So i dont feel particularly strongly for any critera. But "we drew this lines less than 40 Years ago and now they are sacred" seems insane. Similarly "we have the suport of the international comunity" also seems dumb. Compared to those the one i proposed does not sound as derranged.
What decides the objective control of territory is force of arms. But is that the source of legitimacy?
As for israel. I have said before that i do not necessarily object to them having their own country. I object to it being in the middle east. I think we can all agree that some things happened last century and maybe germany can give them some land as compensation.
One time i was hanging out with my friends and we stped by a convinience store. They were carring a type of vanilla soda that was manufactured locally at the time and had a very limited distrubtion. Seenig that i was happy and ordered one. my friends gave me surprised looks. So i asked them why, and aparently the drink was marketed to gay people. So i responded well i like it so what if its gey? I think thats the best response to these kind of asholes.
Of course russia has no obligation. If armenia and iran arent doing anything why should russia. I agree.
But going from there to "the legitimacy of a state is given by its international recognition" is bullshit. i think is a good criteria for the legitimacy of a state is "are these people overe there going to be eathnically cleansed without it?".
As for armenia not exsisting either. I agree. It further strengthens my point that these borders do not matter.
Pro can-adian mods
What does that have to do with anything? The reality is that the people living there are going to get ethnically cleansed. And the baku regime was not even a country 40 years ago.
The can-adians claim india assasinated an indian terrorist they were harboring. Wich if they did good. He should have been extradited. But they didnt. Should the rest of the world just sit there and acept that? The can-adians are harboring all types of criminals and most countries just opt for apeasment. For example this guy https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/448657/Judiciary-chief-slams-West-for-harboring-Iranian-financial-criminals iran should act more like india.
Didnt the pershing ii have a warhead that could maneuver at hypersonic speeds? While it is still a balistic missile and not a glider presumably the materials used should meet the heat requierments of a hypersonic glider? Unless it was all made up and it didnt do what it claimed?