[-] Floon@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago

I run GrapheneOS. I'm also not a dick about it.

[-] Floon@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 months ago

You care too much about this. Let people enjoy things.

[-] Floon@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 months ago

Boost is my favorite. Clean UI and attractive icon.

[-] Floon@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 months ago

One, let's accept that there is a public domain, and cribbing freely from the public domain is A-OK. I can reproduce Michaelangelo all I want, and it's all good. AI can crib from that all it wants.

AI can't invent. People can invent: i can have a wholly new idea that no one has ever had. AI does nothing but recombine other existing ideas. It must have seed data, and it won't create anything for which it has no initial input: feed it photographs only, and it can't create a pencil drawing image. Feed it only black and white images, and it can't create color images.

People do not require cribbing from sources. Give a toddler supplies, and they will create. So, we have established that there is a fundamental difference between the creation process. One is dependent on previous work, and one is not.

Now, with influences, you can ask, is your new creation dependent on the previous creation directly? If it is so utterly dependent on the prior work, such that your work could not possibly exist without that specific prior art, you might get sued. It will get debated and society's best approximation of a collective rational mind will determine if you copied or if you created something new that was merely inspired by prior art.

AI can only create by the direct existence of prior art. It fakes invention. Its work has to come from somewhere else.

People have shown how dependent it is on its sources with prompts that say things like, "portrait of a patriotic soldier superhero" and it comes back with a goddamned portrait of Chris Evans. The prompt did not include his name, or Captain or America, and it comes back with an MCU movie poster. AI does not create. People create.

[-] Floon@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 months ago

Just because they can take control of the domain doesn't mean they somehow have access to the data any servers that used the domain have. Those servers were, i feel confident, not in Afghanistan. Domains are just redirects, so the Taliban have nothing on any of the users.

[-] Floon@lemmy.ml 6 points 7 months ago

As an ex-Turbinite, nice to hear DDO praise these days. LOTRO is still around too.

I've been playing Star Citizen lately: actually a game now, and not a scam. Obviously sci-fi and not fantasy, but it's pretty great, especially with non-combat activities.

[-] Floon@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago

Working just fine for me...

[-] Floon@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago

Plenty of people said if Bernie wasn't the nominee, they'd vote Trump. Puzzle that one.

[-] Floon@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago

I wasn't a bad person in my 20s, but I was stupid and thought I was smart. There's a lot to learn that you learn after a few years as an adult: you learn what's important, and what's just a waste of time. As you get older, you have fewer and fewer fucks to spare for the waste of time stuff.

[-] Floon@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago

People responding to the meme that needing cars isn't evil, and is required for many areas, are missing the point of the meme.

The meme is complaining about areas we built that can exist as they are only if everyone owns a car. If we weren't so consumerist, and if white people could better tolerate living near black people, we wouldn't have so much of the population living in suburban areas where cars are so necessary. A lot more people would live in circumstances where public transport is more viable for them.

And, of course, some shade thrown at the car buyers who buy comsumptively-extreme cars to do piddling stuff in. The number of basic sedans that can be had with 200+hp engines, or F150 pickups with massive gas-guzzling engines, that only get used for surface road driving one or two people around, is pretty ridiculous.

The main wrong thing about the meme is that it's assuming our situation was created specifically so that evil corporations could sell cars and gas... no, they're profiting from, and exacerbating, the problem of white flight from cities. Most of the country's problems come in large part from racism first, and then profiteering on top of that.

[-] Floon@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago

It's amazing Canter & Siegel were the most hated people on the Internet at one time...

[-] Floon@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them." -Karl Popper

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Floon

joined 1 year ago