FreeWilliam

joined 5 days ago
[–] FreeWilliam@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

If they mean what I understood, that this is the first time they have hit since the ceasefire, then is pure bs. I live in Lebanon, and not only do they still strike, but they also constantly fly MK drones and war planes above us to break the sound barrier for phycological torment. The ceasefire merely limited the number of times they do it. Our government, of course, is silent, and we still have a political system in where only Christians are permitted to be president even though more than half of the population is Muslim, which results in presidents that neglect places like the south. How corrupt.

Edit: Didn't even need to wait 30 minutes to hear an MK drone

[–] FreeWilliam@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

You make amazing points, and I completely agree with you. I will continue to use Jami since it's good enough for me to talk with my friends. I mean now the only replacement which is not a replacement just another thing I use to chat is GNU Emacs. I hope the development speed and motivation increases and please do inform me if you found an alternative

[–] FreeWilliam@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If it's not fully free, I don't trust it. I don't understand how someone in a privacy community doesn't understand how much a few lines of code can track someone so easily no matter how much of the program is free software.

[–] FreeWilliam@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, this is just the reality of unpaid free software developers, they don't have the recourses to work on every single bug as quick as a paid developer, but that doesn't justify not reporting bugs and working with the developers to fix them. Like you said, Jami is grest ethically so why not make it great function? Also, don't you have a computer and a phone? Test on those. I don't own a phone, so I can't test the phone, but I do gladly test on my laptop.

[–] FreeWilliam@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Great, but it relies on signal's servers, so it's centralised. Also, Moly merely removes proprietary parts from Signal, but that’s a workaround (same thing for linux-libre kernel, it's free software, but just a workaround which is why I'm looking to help with HyprbolaBSD). I'm not coming here to say Molly isn't an improvement, but being centralised and relying on a non-tully-free program's servers is a huge red flag for me :)

[–] FreeWilliam@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago (5 children)

That’s not the full picture. That's exactly the problem I was highlighting. The issue isn't whether some of the code is "FOSS", it’s about whether all of it is. If even small parts remain proprietary (as you mentioned), then we can’t verify what those parts are doing. And those parts could theoretically significantly affect the data collection. Also, I didn't make up a lot of stuff. The Signal Foundation themselves have confirmed that certain UI and build components are not fully libre. As the GNU project puts it, if part of your system is closed, then you're trusting a black box, no matter how well-lit the rest of it is.

[–] FreeWilliam@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago (5 children)

And we should report problems and fix them ourselves to make it better

[–] FreeWilliam@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago

Go to your local repair shop and see if they have / can get you a new one.

[–] FreeWilliam@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 days ago

It's great that he's speaking about Gaza, but with the wealth, power, and control he has, just speaking isn't going to be enough. Hopefully, he'll act on his words and send aid.

[–] FreeWilliam@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (32 children)

Jami.net

Ignore the comment saying signal is "end to end encrypted" "private" etc They are simply stuck in a delusional state where they try to convince themselves that signal is the best option so they can continue using it. Nothing is private if it isn't fully libre because you never know what the proprietary code is doing. The signal protocol itself has its source code released, and the encryption and security code is publicly available, but the signal Foundation has stated that it uses both free code and proprietary code. Their reason is UI, but it's hard to make sure whatever proprietary code is being used for because you simply can't see it. As GNU puts it: "You're walking in a pitch black cave". Jami is fully libre and is a GNU project. You don't even need any phone number!

view more: next ›