God, if only people could just like pool their resources together to build homes or something...

We could even call it something like "social housing," and have it be a publically regulated service instead of treating housing as some sort of game of investment for the wealthy? No no, totally impossible...

I see Tennesee's wannabe dictators are at it again. The GOP does not want to govern it wants to rule.

This is the attitude to have. Anything else is defeatist.

I always laugh at the people who cry about needing to "compromise" on these things.

I want the forced nationalisation of the energy industry and a managed decline of fossil fuels. Passing legislation to regulate them instead is the compromise, now make it effective actually instead of this weak-ass incentive based bs

I do grasp writing, that is specifically why I asked this question, because the headline framing it as a loss is negative to people who aren't already supportive of climate action.

If they defederate, guess I'll start using my account based here more (but I like maximum access to the federation with the minimum amount of accounts).

I'm so glad y'all federated. Lemmy has been so much more liberal compared to Mastodon.

"actually, it's about protecting MY kids, who I would NEVER let this happen to, who fucking cares about some OTHER parent's child?"

Hopefully, that won't be the case much longer in Ohio with November's ballot question. (the GOP just failed to make it harder to pass by trying to make all constitutional amendments require 60% to pass after polling showed it would by 58%)

complains about being unfairly labelled a nazi, uses the same platform to make a joke feeding into holocaust denial

Yeah didn't Paine say something about how the slaves would be justified to kill their masters?

So a fascist governor is trying to train a militia that answers only to him? Brownshirts anyone?