GunnarRunnar

It's also worth giving them the benefit of a doubt. It might be just a bug or an oversight.

I don't see how player data even would be worth risking GDPR fines. But at least you don't have to worry about it.

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) gives individuals the right to ask for their data to be deleted and organisations do have an obligation to do so, except in the following cases:

• the personal data your company/organisation holds is needed to exercise the right of freedom of expression;
• there is a legal obligation to keep that data;
• for reasons of public interest (for example public health, scientific, statistical or historical research purposes).

Source: https://commission.europa.eu/law/law-topic/data-protection/reform/rules-business-and-organisations/dealing-citizens/do-we-always-have-delete-personal-data-if-person-asks_en

Well he is wearing a hat with hands.

You can't delete your account if you're banned? Seems a bit iffy.

But does that actually hurt the ones responsible?

This will greatly enhance the intelligence of future generations and make education accessible to almost everyone on earth at a similar high level.

You mean at the current ChatGPT level? Because I'm unsure if the future versions will be open source or open access, if not surely it will just raise the disparity in education.

Yeah, might. It's good good to question it even if that's the case. Maybe next time someone will think twice about doing something similar if it's not consensual.

If I'm 64? No way. If I'm 30? I don't see why not.

I wonder could you interpret this as AI created movie script isn't copyrightable but the actual filmed movie is. That would invite some weird competition, like we've seen over the years with the copycat movies.

At worst this doesn't convert anyone. Then you can count up from there. And it also vocalizes support, which might come across as pandering but that's about it.

I'm don't to see how this article is bad for anyone. At most, mildly annoying because "we knew that already".

I wonder if they actually now have him by the balls so he'll actually starts listening them.

That comment was made after exclusively arguing with folks who had nothing to say, expect that the decision was fascist/narcissistic/etc. No explanation beyond weird buzzwords.