[-] Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I did encounter a very sour group on a certain subreddit somewhat recently haha. But then just yesterday I was searching something online, found a relevant Reddit post through Google, and found a comment thread where two people were tearing each other apart for no reason other than a slight disagreement. It wasn’t a “hmm, I don’t think so.” It was a long chain where the further you went, the darker, meaner, and snarkier it got. Wish I remembered it right now. That’s what got me thinking and making the meme. But yeah, maybe my own experience planted the initial seed.

[-] Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 hours ago

The law of conservation of fucks: a fuck given means a fuck taken since fucks cannot be created nor destroyed. Basic fuck physics.

[-] Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Yeah, I guess that's the point: if you see a pattern of giving a fuck about something minor, it can become easier to work on not giving a fuck about it. Sometimes not giving a fuck can take fucks.

[-] Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 hours ago

The true "no fucks given" app is the one that only existed as a thought for half a second before being shrugged back off into the void.

307
submitted 16 hours ago by Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
[-] Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml 2 points 16 hours ago

Contains one (1) big bean

[-] Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Incredible. I’m learning a ton and gaining a huge appreciation of it all thanks to everyone’s comments in this post.

[-] Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

I'm in favor. Atmospheric / jazzy / "intelligent" drum and bass is amazing.

[-] Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 days ago

That's wild. But theoretically they could make two separate mono tracks, right? For example, a left mono track with 75% of what would have been an isolated left channel + 25% of the right channel and, similarly, a right mono track with 25% of what would have been an isolated left + 75% of the right. Then, sure, pan switch it fully to left and right.

[-] Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago

It makes sense. I bet it's super hard, especially at first.

It's largely a headphone problem, at least for me. I can't listen to a song where certain tracks are completely isolated to one ear. The audio doesn't need to be mixed perfectly, but I need at least a little bit of each sound in each ear. Otherwise it's too distracting. My brain hates it.

700
submitted 2 days ago by Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
[-] Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml 53 points 1 week ago

Plus the art they started using in gdrive. The art on its own is cool but within the Google ecosystem just feels like… what is it even… why… ugh I hate it.

842
submitted 2 weeks ago by Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
273
A true leader (lemmy.ml)
696
submitted 4 weeks ago by Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml

I know the meme format is kinda wrong. It's also kinda right.

[-] Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml 81 points 1 month ago

When I was in the end of my PhD, everything except writing my thesis made me feel guilty. I ended up learning to find joy and peace in doing laundry and washing dishes. They became my guilt-free breaks — I had to do these things. FYI - I didn’t enjoy washing dishes before.

Washing dishes has become a really powerful part of my day, haha. Not only is it still a guilt-free break but it is a daily reminder to be mindful. I’ve noticed that whenever I drop and break a dish, my mind is not present. In fact, in those moments my mind might actually be drifting somewhere negative.

Maybe not so much a “hack” as a … lesson? Or something? But yeah, the whole cliche about having the right attitude and being present and mindful. I try to apply it in other parts of life, not just the dishes.

[-] Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml 68 points 4 months ago

I once heard of an experiment in economics that offers insight into this.

Say you have 100 people. You give each of them one of two choices:

A : you get $40 unconditionally B: you get $70 - n, where n is the number of people who choose B

You end up getting, on average across experiments, n = 30.

If you move the numbers around (i.e, the $40 and the $70), you keep getting, on average, a number of people choosing B so that B pays out the same as A.

I think the interpretation is that people can be categorized by the amount of risk they’re willing to take. If you make B less risky, you’ll get a new category of people. If you make it more risky, you’ll lose categories.

Applied to traffic, opening up a new lane brings in new categories of people who are willing to risk the traffic.

Or something. Sorry I don’t remember it better and am too lazy to look it up. Pretty pretty cool though.

view more: next ›

Hammocks4All

joined 4 months ago