It could be liquid hydrogen though.
Hydrogen is lighter than air, which means that any fire would be much more brief and hard to sustain.
Not anymore than any other fuel.
It is a huge greenwashing exercise in reality.
It is storing hydrogen in metal hydrides which is very safe.
You should actually try to read the article.
These use green hydrogen.
Those are outright lies. For one thing, you can use fuel cells instead of gas turbines, getting rid of NOx emissions entirely (not to mention you can filter out NOx even with gas turbines).
Sorry, but this conversation cannot continue if you proceed with dishonest arguments.
If you adopt hydrogen for energy storage, you no longer have to worry about "where." You have a solution that is nearly geographically independent.
The more renewable energy you have, the more you need long-duration energy storage. You cannot reach 100% renewable energy without huge amounts of it.
For a few hours, yes, but that will make up a small percentage of total energy stored. To really solve the intermittency problem, you will need large scale energy storage.
Ok, in that case, we should call it "new comments."