For anyone scratching their heads (my D5300 had a built in GPS!) - most current cameras rely on a companion phone app for GPS coordinates. Some do this better than others. Here's my experience, based on my understanding of how each system works.

• Fujifilm is best. You can configure their cameras to retain their last GPS location for a set amount of time, so if you're like me and turn your camera on/off a lot during an afternoon none of your photos will be without GPS coordinates - with the possible exception of the first few
• Nikon/Sony cameras both forget their location any time they get powered off, but re-pair to my phone reliably when powered on. I've spent a lot more time with Sony's app and it gives you a notification anytime the camera connection status changes, so you have a cue to know if you're paired
• Olympus is the worst I've used. The OM-1 can embed GPS coordinates in the photos it takes as you take them, but for this to work you have to open their app on your phone and toggle a "record location" setting. I might have the exact name of the toggle wrong. Prior models require you to merge the apps location recording with the photos via OM Workspace on a computer. The app also generates notifications for things like events and sales. None of the other brands do that

Three ideas.

First, are you taking photos of static or dynamic subjects? In other words, can you push your shutter speed down to make up for lost light? If yes, it doesn't really matter which sensor format you go with. As an added bonus, M43 stabilization is stupid good so you might even be able to skip the tripod.

Second, there's no beating a fast FF lens on a FF body but those are going to be big and expensive. Here's a quick comparison. The Sony lens is 1.7 pounds and costs $2,000 new vs the Oly's 0.9 pounds and $1,200 price tag. There are super fast third party E-mount options that will save some $$, but no weight (hi Sigma), and slower first and third party options that will save $$ and weight, but will also start to eat into the two stop advantage FF sensors enjoy in low light. For example, Sigma's 50mm f/2 lens, which weighs 0.75 pounds and costs $640, will leave you with around 2/3 stop advantage in low light. It's still an advantage, and it even costs and weighs less than the Oly, but it's not a large advantage in terms of dynamic range.

Finally, with a fast FF lens you're going to be facing a fairly narrow depth of field wide open. That 50mm f/1.2 FF lens will give you a 0.11m depth of field wide open with a subject that's 2m away. If you want the extreme background of your image sharp, everything closer than 35m will be out of focus. Conversely, that 25mm f/1.2 MFT lens will give you a 0.23m depth of field with a subject that's 2m away and with infinity acceptably sharp you'll have a sharp foreground subjects 17.5m and further away from the camera. Stopping down the FF lens will increase its depth of field, but will again eat into the inherent advantage a FF body has over a M43 body.

There aren't many DSLR like fixed lens cameras out on the market today as that segment has basically evaporated.

The remaining players are:

• Fujifilm x100. There are six total iterations of this camera, the most recent of which was very recently released. It's a bit of a cult classic, which means wait lists. It's an APS-C camera and from a controls perspective is probably what you're looking for
• Rioch GR. This is another series of cameras that are pretty popular. It's also APS-C based. The mkIII was introduced in 2019
• Sony RX, in particular the RX1R. Unlike the other two, it uses a full frame sensor. Also unlike the other two, it's by far the longest in the tooth

What are you looking for that the G1X mkIII doesn't offer? Buying a used copy might be the way to go, especially since it sounds like what you're looking for.

As far as currently in production options, in addition to the three above, you could also look at mirrorless. Both their bodies and lenses are more compact than their DSLR counterparts. As far as sensor size goes, Micro Four Thirds (micro four thirds) can offer the most compact glass, followed by APS-C and then FF. That said a compact FF body, with a slower (read: smaller) lens will generally be close in size to a MFT camera with a fast lens. For outdoor and sunny, there will be no image quality tradeoff and when it gets dark the FF camera with a slower lens and a MFT sensor with a faster lens will be more or less on par thanks to the FF sensor's two stop improvement in low light. For example (scroll down if you don't see the two cameras and lenses). This does start to fall apart at longer focal lengths though - there's no substitute for the crop factor advantage beyond say 100mm of FF EQ focal length.

So... What are you looking for?

If it was only one shitty ancient system it would be one thing. For the company I work for it's about 10 big interconnected mainframe systems with hundreds of non-mainframe systems cobbled together around them. They've been in place since the 80s, but you can trace their business logic back to the 50s and 60s. They start at cataloging all our parts and get into purchasing components from suppliers, describing the products we assemble, managing the supply chains for our factories, order management from our customers, etc.

Replacing it all will be massive chore, but it's becoming more and more clear that we need to. At the end of the day, capturing and understanding data in them takes so much skill that we have entire departments dedicated to being an interface between the actual users and the mainframe. The business rules might have worked before the products we build contained electronic controls, but everything is starting to implode now that "parts" also includes software. This has resulted in manual workaround on top of manual workaround.

Thanks!

I'm just a rando lurking all / hot and stumbled upon this. You look extremely happy, so props!

Ditto for mobile. IMO the mobile site wasn't great, but I haven't been on much lately.

Thanks for the other community link! I was being a bit facetious with this particular image, but I caught a few other probably-a-fly-but-lookes-like-a-bees that I'll post over the next few days.

We have a very pollinator friendly yard, so we have all kinds of flying critters. I won't limit myself to just bees and bee lookalikes though :)

Canon kept their RF mount locked down, but has been opening it up a tiny bit recently. This is a fairly new lens, so it's probably been optimized for mirrorless. If that is the case, it won't be compatible with DSLR bodies due to flang distances. You can push a DSLR optimized lens out further to mount on a MILC body. You can't move a MILC optimized lens closer to a DSLR body.

Haha, tell me why I'm on e-mount without telling me why I'm on e-mount. Canon and Sony seem to be on par for easy AF, but the back catalog of lenses on e-mount is hard to beat.

Hopefully Canon continues to let more third part glass use their mount.

Ditto. I've managed to snag a few photos of birds on/near our feeder from a very close distance. The fine details are pretty amazing.

Both. Ethonal is still corrosive and the majority of fuel systems these days are compatible with E15. That said, check your owners manual.