C, C++, C#, to name the main ones. And quite a lot of languages are compiled similarly to these.
To be clear, there's a lot of caveats to the statement, and it depends on architecture as well, but at the end of the day, it's rare for a byte
or bool
to be mapped directly to a single byte in memory.
Say, for example, you have this function...
public void Foo()
{
bool someFlag = false;
int counter = 0;
...
}
The someFlag
and counter
variables are getting allocated on the stack, and (depending on architecture) that probably means each one is aligned to a 32-bit or 64-bit word boundary, since many CPUs require that for whole-word load and store instructions, or only support a stack pointer that increments in whole words. If the function were to have multiple byte
or bool
variables allocated, it might be able to pack them together, if the CPU supports single-byte load and store instructions, but the next int
variable that follows might still need some padding space in front of it, so that it aligns on a word boundary.
A very similar concept applies to most struct and object implementations. A single byte
or bool
field within a struct or object will likely result in a whole word being allocated, so that other variables and be word-aligned, or so that the whole object meets some optimal word-aligned size. But if you have multiple less-than-a-word fields, they can be packed together. C# does this, for sure, and has some mechanisms by which you can customize field packing.
Interesting that several people are reporting using "you" for negative sentiments, because I use "I" for those as well. E.G. "Well, I'm a fucking idiot."