Oh so you weren't a fan of this one
Jimmycrackcrack
Ironically despite not being from there I know more about that phenomenon in the American system than that of my own country but I should imagine a similar dynamic is at play here, there, in Japan and everywhere. It takes a great deal of time and money to conduct trials and there's a lot of pressure to clear backlogs so if you can persuade someone to either admit the crime they really did because there's overwhelming evidence or simply capitulate even though they actually didn't do it because the risks if they lose at trial are so high then you manage to help to this end. I'm sure that's happening in what you're observing but it sounds like those types of incentives operate everywhere whereas the negative commentary about Happen in particular seemed to be about an unusually high conviction rate which is used as indirect evidence of a lack of fair process so if that's sticking out even with this phenomenon occurring then it sounds fishy. But again I'm really just repeating rumours.
I've heard some dodgy stuff about their conviction rates and tendency to stitch people up but I've not really read in to it.
I first saw this a while ago but it's such a zinger haha still cracks me up. What a burn
Haha I like the way the cartoonist decided the reactions of the characters should go. I kind of assumed it'd be the Dad character looking grumpy here for being called out on telling the same joke over and over but the dude's chuffed as fuck. Kinda sweet.
Also saying "chuffed" definitely makes me thing of this tangentially related thing about chuffed Dads
False, those are actually quite far away from me as I can not even see you.
This can't really be answered categorically without the actual specific scenario occurring again but specifically with Uyghur Muslims in China and a Chinese official of similar rank and standing doing the same thing and publishing a video of it but even accepting that western media sources have double standards and biases I kind of think the answer to your question would be yes. I mean it's just literally descriptive of what happened. A minister mocked the flotilla activists. The article is one of many about those that took part in the flotilla that were abused and tortured by the IDF and previous such flotillas and the general pattern of reporting has not favourable PR for Israel. Specifically even the claim of torture is something I was able to find within seconds in major sources like CNN. This particular event, within the context of existing negative press, focussed upon this specific outrage that happens to have sparked particular ire worldwide hence getting it's whole own article separate and apart from the events of the flotilla and its interception.
This really shows how much of sounding drunk is just plain speaking slow. Like I swear he's slurring his speech here like an actual drunk, which as I'd understood it would mean a more random cadence of speed with just some syllables of words extended but this is just uniformly slowed and works perfectly.
Also, irish stew doesn't have beans.
The trouble with kids is that there's an element of random chaos in the decision making that cannot be accounted for and it's likely the fallout from those decisions that ultimately helps them develop the palpable and visceral sense against making them as they get older. I'm sure literally trying very hard to teach them the value of things helps, they do have the capacity to listen and learn after all. But the way I see it there's always a non zero chance that some totally different and bizarre thinking process will override all of that at random moments.
All those people that treated you as "weird" for this do it themselves as well. If you were gaining special attention for this in particular such that multiple people noticed and weren't just messing with you, then it's probably not the fact of your blank staring itself, but the length of time. Normal steady gaze at nothing in particular for periods is normal and people only perceive it as staring when it's reached some threshold length of time.
Why you specifically might be doing this past that threshold I couldn't tell you. Many are suggesting ADHD or Autism, could well be but otherwise maybe you're just finding yourself easily distracted or prefer longer trips into your own head. If you worry about it, best suggestion is just to randomize your gaze periodically in response to stimuli in the room, but the thing is if you're not already doing that automatically it's probably because you're too engrossed in thought for that stimuli to get through.
Cunning runt