JoeyJoeJoeJr

joined 2 years ago
[–] JoeyJoeJoeJr@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

🐈+🐒=πŸ‚πŸ‚πŸ‚

[–] JoeyJoeJoeJr@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Desktop publishing" is the category of software you want. I've not used it, but I believe Scribus is the standard FOSS tool for this. If you want a simple graphical way to make your album, this is the way.

Many people have metnioned LaTex - I would not recommend it for this purpose. LaTex, while powerful, will have a steep learning curve, and isn't really made for artistic tasks - its purpose is for writing technical papers. From literally the first two sentences on the project site:

LaTeX is a high-quality typesetting system; it includes features designed for the production of technical and scientific documentation. LaTeX is the de facto standard for the communication and publication of scientific documents.

It's probably possible to make a beautiful photo album with LaTex, but without a lot of work, it's more likely to come out looking like a calculator manual.

[–] JoeyJoeJoeJr@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it is less a question of whether the voice sounds like Scarlett Johansson, as that is subjective and arbitrary (e.g. assume you could objectively measure the similarity, what's the acceptable cut off - 80%? 90%?). The same is true for the uniqueness of her voice.

I think the real question will come down to intention. They clearly wanted her voice. Did they intentionally attempt to replicate it when they couldn't have the real thing? If so, there is precedent that would suggest they could be in a little trouble here, e.g. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1990-05-09-me-238-story.html

[–] JoeyJoeJoeJr@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This kind of reminds me of Crispin Glover, from Back to the Future. He tried to negotiate a higher pay for the second movie, so the producers hired a different actor to play the role, but deliberately made the actor up to look like Glover. In response, Glover sued the producers and won. It set a critical precedent for Hollywood, about using someone's likeness without consent.

The article mentions they reached out to her two days before the launch - if she had said 'OK,' there's no way they could have even recorded what they needed from her, let alone trained the model in time for the presentation. So they must have had a Scarlett Johansson voice ready to go. Other than training the model on movies (really not ideal for a high quality voice model), how would they have gotten the recordings they needed?

If they hired a "random" voice actress, they might not run into issues. But if at any point they had a job listing, a discussion with a talent manager, or anything else where they mentioned wanting a "Scarlett Johansson sound-alike," they might have dug themselves a nice hole here.

Specifically regarding your question about hiring a voice actor that sounds like someone else - this is commonly done to replace people for cartoons. I don't think it's an issue if you are playing a character. But if you deliberately impersonate a person, there might be some trouble.

[–] JoeyJoeJoeJr@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] JoeyJoeJoeJr@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Homer at the Bat, season 3.

[–] JoeyJoeJoeJr@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

Two Bad Neighbors

[–] JoeyJoeJoeJr@lemmy.ml 39 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Not to justify the actions of the shooter, but ringing the doorbell before breaking in is definitely a thing. It's a means of checking if the house is occupied - if you're just trying to steal things, an unoccupied house is ideal, and if someone answers when you ring, it's easy enough to make up an excuse and walk away.

A much better solution than a gun, though, is a security door (similar to a screen door, but more kick proof).

[–] JoeyJoeJoeJr@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago

Not sure if it's what you're looking for, but lirc has a database. Instructions for contributing files can be found here, files should adhere to the checklist here.

[–] JoeyJoeJoeJr@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Considering that you are not using their software, was the laptop worth the premium you paid for it, vs buying from Clevo directly?

I figured the hardware and software coming from the same vendor would yield the best results, and wanted to support a company that supports right-to-repair, and Linux in general. But ultimately I found Pop!_OS buggy and had performance issues, so I'm not using their OS, and their firmware is causing issues with my SSD, so I'd like to be off of it as well (but was told "there's no process for reverting to the proprietary firmwareβ€œ for the specific model I have). I could have bought a Clevo directly, saving hundreds of dollars, and probably had a better working machine.

[–] JoeyJoeJoeJr@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Would not recommend System76. I've had many issues with my machine (primarily software, related to their buggy custom firmware, and Pop!_OS, until I ditched that for stock Ubuntu). Their support has been terrible - rather similar to OP's, actually. I've had the laptop for about 2.5 years, and I'm checking practically daily for something to replace it.

[–] JoeyJoeJoeJr@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For what it's worth, I just bought a TCL 55S450F (55 inch 4K HDR FireTV) specifically because it does not ever need an internet connection to function (expressly stated in the manual). It is currently on Amazon for $268 (they have other sizes at other prices). It's a great TV, considering the price. The only real drawback for me is the remote is Bluetooth, rather than infrared (less compatible with universal remotes).

Note that for full dumb TV effect, you'll want to go into the settings and tell it to resume the last input, rather than going to the home screen when you turn it on (without connecting it to the Internet, the home screen is basically just a big banner telling you it's not connected, and when you dismiss that, it just allows you to access inputs and manage settings).

view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί