Joncash2

joined 2 years ago
[–] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

That's way too difficult a question to answer. But that said my theory is USA will have a lost decade like Japan. The distrust and broken agreements should have decades long effects. Can USA get back to where they were? Maybe, but no matter what now, it's going to take decades.

[–] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

The biggest issue I have isn't that they're evil. Though obviously that's a huge issue, but that they are woefully incompetent. We've seen this type of evil before in the USA. Richard Nixon is obviously well known to be a greedy goon. But he did it in a way people didn't really see it until after he was impeached. Trump is way too obvious for his own good. Though, maybe that's a good thing... Burn it down asap

[–] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

No, the tariffs are actively preventing monetary easing. If you were wondering what the news about bond rates and the conflict between Bessent and Powell is about, it's because they can't ease.

At a core easing relies on borrowing money to fix the downturn. Usually, when a downturn happens, interest rates go down because there's less to invest in. If you can't get a 8% return on stocks, you buy bonds until bond returns go below 4% or so. Except, thanks to crazy man tariffs, no one trusts the bonds anymore. So USA can't ease.

I also want to note, this was clearly Bessents original plan. Hurt the economy with tariffs, then do easing and pull more money back into the American Treasury. But oops, no one trusts USA anymore...

*Edit: Lol, god damn this happens fast. Powell is talking about what I'm talking about here literally just now.

https://lemmy.ml/post/29763814?scrollToComments=true

So the inflation he's talking about is why they can't ease. Normally when stocks go down, bonds go up it's caused by deflation. People stop spending money so prices go down and thus, bond rates go down. But we're not seeing deflation, we're seeing inflation, which again is causing the inability to monetarily ease. It's just funny to me we were just talking about this and bam, there's a news article.

[–] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 26 points 2 days ago (6 children)

That's a misunderstanding of the causes. Now, admittedly there's a debate on this so what I will say is an opinion, but one that shows how the tariffs did cause the great depression.

The problem people have in understanding the great depression is the initial shock isn't the cause so much as the trigger to the cause which is the tariffs.

Had the tariffs not come into play, the stock sell off and subsequent deflation could have been resolved with simple monetary easing, which is what we do today. This would have simply been a recession and we would move on. However, the tariffs following the stock sell off is why it's the great depression and not just a simple recession.

In fairness, monetary easing policy didn't really come into play until after Brenton wood agreement. That said, it would have been the right solution during the onset of the great depression.

So you can't actually say that tariffs didn't cause the great depression as again had it not been for tariffs we would have pulled through.

[–] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago

Why? I can tell you now that the Chinese delegation will essentially say nothing and simply report publically what the US is asking for. Something that other nations haven't done yet to allow USA to save face. This isn't something that China would be willing to do. China has no demands yet, nor any desire to end the trade war. What they do have a desire for is to make everything USA is trying to steal public knowledge.

[–] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 25 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's not true, I have it on good authority they're playing Biden and Kamala speeches.

[–] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The translation isn't right, but I'm way too lazy to try to translate it all. Basically the whole thing boils down to why do I work at all, I should be selfish. To be honest, this doesn't seem convincing at all. Like what spy working for another country would flip because they decided they are selfish? Oh wait, American ones.

https://historica.fandom.com/wiki/Barry_Seal

Sorry America, the rest of the world isn't as full of selfish assholes like you are.

*Edit. I just realized something. If this is all they have to convince Chinese people to flip, they're really scratching the bottom of the barrel. Back in the day, against the soviets it was propaganda about a better life for their families and children. Now it's why won't the Chinese government give me millions.

[–] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Wait, polestar only now pulled ahead in Sweden? That's honestly kind if sad. If your home nation won't support you, how will anyone else. So yeah good, but this should have always been the trend.

[–] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's worse than that. Sure China is huge, but the entire world is boycotting US goods. It's far far worse than what your pointing out. But we'll, maybe this is a good thing. Fuck USA.

[–] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

Well, no. I mean if you look at history, USA has tried all those things in China as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_espionage_in_China

China is just better at handling it. There's reasons for this, but that's a whole separate topic of conversation. Suffice to say, look at what happened in 2010. That's why China can do it, not the nukes.

[–] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Pump and dump baby. Classic insider trading scheme. Just on a national level with the largest economy in the world at the moment. He's probably going to be a trillionaire after this. Also, he's feeding his friends info on signal, so probably more money selling info as well.

[–] Joncash2@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Whaaa? Blocking social media requires nukes? What's going on in Iran then?

Antagonizing USA requires nukes? What's happening in Venezuela?

Waiting out your opponent requires nukes? Well at this point I point to the entire planet waiting out USA's tariff plan.

Not sure where anything I said doesn't have an analogous example of a country doing exactly that and they do not have nukes. It's just no one does all at once which is as I said the real reason China is winning.

view more: next ›