KingSlareXIV

Credit/debit systems appear to have existed for at least 5000 years. Money is just an abstraction technology to make the credit/debit economy work more smoothly and scale up.

As money is a foundational tech for civilization, you'd need to find a replacement tech that serves much the same purpose, but avoids whatever downsides you feel outweigh it's benefits. That's a hard problem.

Then implement it in such a way that civilization doesn't implode during the transition. This is a very hard problem.

And then prevent humanity from finding a way to exploit that tech for the benefit of the few, bringing you right back where you started. This is a nearly impossible problem.

Well, that's not at all what I said. Japanese compact cars were generally pretty cool and affordable in a way most similar small American cars were not, so of course they get customized a ton more that their American equivilents.

The people who actually made their cars perform were the racers, those who did the truly terrible mods were the ricers.

Yes, racist due to stereotyping. But it was more wordplay for insulting the taste of the person in question in comparison to the racers, not their ethnicity or the origin of their car. Bad taste is pretty universal. And as with pretty much anything in language, people can and clearly have used it as a racial insult. I just don't think that was it's origin.

I am really amused it has morphed into a more positive connotation with the *nix crowd, while still meaning essentially the same thing. Language truly is a living thing.

I mean it has clearly racist origins, but I've never actually heard it used in a racist manner in real life.

At least where I was, there were basically zero Asians, "ricers" were (typically but not exclusively) Japanese cars that were customized terribly, as someone else mentioned, all show and no go. You could have American ricers too.

The owners, the "rice boys", were pretty much all white guys.

I get that Ukraine won't consider the possibility of ceding any territory, nor should they. They probably don't like their allies even mentioning it.

But, there's the separate issue of not being able to join NATO with ongoing territorial disputes. Without much context to go on, I would almost interpret this as something more along the lines of "Ukraine could join NATO tomorrow if the dispute went away (by whatever method)".

My one experience was good. Randomly picked one place to call, they straight up told me it was gonna be a while until they could get to me, and to call this other company to see if they could help faster.

The place they recommended rerouted a couple of their drivers while I was on the phone to get to me faster, they were there in 30 minutes, did a good job, and the whole experience was very pleasant.

Definitely have both places in my contact list if I ever need another tow.

Its amusing how this thread went from the legitimacy of various naval exercises and then shifted to trade policy when that didn't pan out, which is an entirely different animal, its more of an elephant than a zebra. (It ain't black and white, definitely grey.)

Trying to get me to defend the Cuba trade embargo ain't gonna happen, because it really is pointless and harmful. But I like how its conveniently ignored that the rest of the world could easily more than cover what the US refuses to send to Cuba. The US Navy wouldn't stop them from doing so, because the blockade ended decades ago.

But oddly enough, that doesn't happen. I wonder why not? Because, oh no, what would the world do without more of those sweet, sweet dollars??? Yeah, never mind the ethics, one can't forgo profits from trade with the US, so let's go fuck the Cubans right along with the Americans, and keep our citizens fat and happy with a steady supply of Levis, Big Macs, and movies. But, you know, lets continue paying lip service to how bad it is while making money hand over fist in complicity.

A truly astounding amount of hypocrisy. The US has plenty of hypocrisy to go around too, but at least I am not going to try to defend it.

I know docker gets jammed into a lot of different equipment these days, wasn't aware of it in network switches tho.

What sorts of containerized workloads are typically run on network equipment?

I am mostly sure the naval blockade of Cuba ended well before I was born, so there is zero freedom of navigation issue happening currently.

The embargo only applies to US companies, we aren't stopping other countries from continuing to trade witch Cuba.

I mean, it's stupid as hell, and will never work, but that's about the extent of it.

The US ain't paradise, I am not gonna argue that. But we were talking about naval policy. We definitely don't have children serving in the navy 😜

I'm kind of half cloud architect and half traditional Windows server engineering, and I hate coding.

So, these days you want to consider Cloud Architecture. You might need to learn a little bit of Terraform or similar, but it's not really traditional scripting. Your job is to know all the offerings of your preferred cloud vendor, and be able to use them to design an environment to meet business requirements in a secure/resilient manner. You'll need a solid understanding of networking and security concepts to do it well. But pretty minimal coding.

You may build it out via Terraform, or maybe you send the design to a dedicated build team. Once built it goes to the app folks to do their app coding. You probably help the coders troubleshoot traffic flows a bit, because they are pretty universally terrible at security, networking, and infrastructure in general. Because they are coders, but don't really understand how anything actually works outside of their code. You are the platform expert.

Not saying it'd hurt, but I've never worked anywhere that had network teams managing docker (that'd be a different team). Linux knowledge is just enough to install a vendor supplied appliance on your hypervisor of choice (managed by a different team), anything more than that would have the OS managed by a different team. And I really haven't seen them script much of anything in any language, they have prebuilt tools to do any mass config changes or monitoring or whatever.

They are generally way more concerned about working with horribly convoluted routing issues, misbehaving BGP, firewall policies, etc.

I mean, they don't have to be allowed in international waters, you just need to get all the planet's seafaring countries to dedicate all of their naval resources to a blockade of the US.

The cheaper option is to realize that the USN is generally pretty serious about enforcing freedom of navigation in a way essentially noone else is able to, which is a net positive for the planet. Even when you factor in some of the shady activities and plain old fuckups that they are occasionally involved in.

Frankly I'd be thrilled if China would actually act like the modern global power they clearly want to become, rather than joining Russia in some 1800s imperial LARPing vs the rest of the world.