Kirk

joined 11 months ago
[–] Kirk@startrek.website 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Here's the citation if you really need it. I'm not trying to argue, but the process of becoming more complex and specific to a niche is the literal definition of "evolution":

"A gradual process in which something changes into a different and usually more complex or better form."

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 1 points 10 hours ago

"generators" is too generic but "AI" isn't?

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Based on historical examples of situations when a false narrative was perpetuated for the sake of convenience, and it assisted the person or group who benefited from the perpetuation of the false narrative.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

If I'm reading correctly it sounds like you do agree with Stallman's main point that a casual distinction is needed, you just disagree on the word itself ("ANI" vs "generator").

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 1 points 10 hours ago

But even so- surely you don't believe that Generative AI programs and Hal 9000 are functionally identical? I just think it would be helpful to have a word that doesn't lump those things together.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 6 points 13 hours ago

It's my understanding that anything doing this would also need to also emulate Chromecast, since the "cast" buttons inside the Amazon Prime/Netflix/Spotify/etc apps uses the proprietary Chromecast protocol.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Right there with you. Section 31 kind of hit a so-bad-it's-good again for me. And even Nemesis has the very cool space battle scene.

I could do without Enterprise Season 3, but it's also not like I'm skipping it during a rewatch!

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

But why are you continuing to refer to "AI" as "LLMs"? If you believe the very act of even making a distinction between "AI" and "LLMs" is orthagonal?

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Huh? Professionalism isn't a quantifiable property. It's also not objective. If someone works with Ake in a professional capacity and considers her to be a professional, then she is. To claim otherwise is illogical.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A little cumbersome but gets the job done lol

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I don't like teen dramas and I don't particularly like romance plots, can someone explain why I'm loving this show so much?

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'm loving this show

 

Inspired by a recent talk from Richard Stallman.

From Slashdot:

Speaking about AI, Stallman warned that "nowadays, people often use the term artificial intelligence for things that aren't intelligent at all..." He makes a point of calling large language models "generators" because "They generate text and they don't understand really what that text means." (And they also make mistakes "without batting a virtual eyelash. So you can't trust anything that they generate.") Stallman says "Every time you call them AI, you are endorsing the claim that they are intelligent and they're not. So let's let's refuse to do that."

Sometimes I think that even though we are in a "FuckAI" community, we're still helping the "AI" companies by tacitly agreeing that their LLMs and image generators are in fact "AI" when they're not. It's similar to how the people saying "AI will destroy humanity" give an outsized aura to LLMs that they don't deserve.

Personally I like the term "generators" and will make an effort to use it, but I'm curious to hear everyone else's thoughts.

 

After watching the trailers for Academy I generally liked what I saw, but Holly Hunter felt oddly reminiscent of Geneviève Bujold as Janeway. I even made a comment somewhere on here that was like "I need to be sold more on Holly Hunter".

The marketing made her out to be a "barefoot bohemian who loves old books and records and lounges around the bridge" which honesyl did not appeal to me but I ended up absolutely loving it. She is somehow nailing being a Starfleet captain without falling back on any familiar tropes.

 
 

I have a button that triggers a script for bedtime to turn off all lights, and, if pressed again, checks to see if all lights are off and if so, turns a few (like the bathroom light) on.

My problem is one or two of the lights (connected via Zigbee2Mqtt) are often powered off at the switch on the lamp, meaning HA still sees them as "on" until the power is restored and they can be turned "off" via the app. The lights cannot be turned "off" (in HA) manually.

Is there any good solution for detecting when a light goes missing and turning it "off" in HA?

 

I've always wanted to find out what happened to that guy but also the mystery is part of what makes it so compelling.

 
 
view more: next ›