[-] Lavitz@lemmings.world 17 points 1 month ago

I need the sauce cause that's hilarious if it's true.

[-] Lavitz@lemmings.world 15 points 1 month ago

Welp I'm going to find a bridge and throw myself off of it.

[-] Lavitz@lemmings.world 11 points 1 month ago

In some weird alternate universe where we have a 3rd party candidate, that candidate is killing it. I have redneck neighbors that would look qualified standing next to these two.

[-] Lavitz@lemmings.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Did Trump call Biden a criminal?

[-] Lavitz@lemmings.world 19 points 1 month ago

These gentlemen are debating each other with the confidence and energy of a 6th grade debate club. This is simultaneously the most hilarious and terrifying thing I've ever seen.

[-] Lavitz@lemmings.world 21 points 2 months ago

Talk shit, get hit. That's how free speech works. You can say whatever the hell you want but words have consequences and consequences can suck.

[-] Lavitz@lemmings.world 22 points 3 months ago

I just want an affordable electric car. Can we please focus on this?

[-] Lavitz@lemmings.world 18 points 3 months ago

I mean if we're being capitalists, that's how the free market works, right?

[-] Lavitz@lemmings.world 13 points 4 months ago

https://jacobin.com/2023/06/supreme-court-justices-thomas-alito-corruption-wsj

Technically there is not a law stating that what they're doing is illegal but the laws in place to prevent SCJs from taking bribes were written vaguely purposely because they wanted to leave it open for future interpretations for future crimes. When writing a law you never know what could happen in 5,10 or 20 years and how crimes are committed evolves. The current laws are basically, you'll know a crime when you see it. The argument is being made that since it's not clear it's not a crime but most other judges could never get away with this kind of behavior. This would be concerning coming from any public official but these are the views of the highest court in the land. Congress has the power to impeach SCJs but unfortunately relying on Congress to do anything has been an ongoing joke for 20+ years.

[-] Lavitz@lemmings.world 11 points 7 months ago

Tune in, turn on, burn out

[-] Lavitz@lemmings.world 15 points 7 months ago

100%

I have some bootstraps they can borrow.

[-] Lavitz@lemmings.world 10 points 9 months ago

Buddy at the time Sisco being Sisco was a big deal. It was not organic and it definitely wasn't accepted by everyone. You need more context for the times when the past series came out. You don't feel like the past series are pushing the boundaries because those boundaries have already been pushed. All of that stuff has been normalized and accepted in part because of Star Trek.

You have the right to not like the new Star Trek series but you can't blame it on it being progressive and woke because that's always been Star Treks MO.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Lavitz

joined 10 months ago