More specifically: "4 people died from covid" is also true
AFAIK they would get the info "which user said what". The source would be what ever instance you are from tho, not your own ip. So the owner of a instance knows as much as everyone else.
No, they just put it as background music in their videos, but didn't actually pay for it. I would guess it constitutes fair use?
The 1949 geneva conventions have been rattified by (afaik exclusively): all UN members, palestine, the holy see and the cook islands. The singning binds the signee to uphold these rules for themselves. How then could the UN, who as you said is "just an extension of its member states", not follow the morals you yourself held as the absolute standard?
I mean yes there is the command to cover yourself in the quran, [24:31] for example ("... And tell the believing women to lower their gaze and guard their chastity, and not to reveal their adornments except what normally appears. Let them draw their veils over their chests, and not reveal their ˹hidden˺ adornment...").
Still, the idea of women generally being forced to wear it by their family/social circle is wrong.
There is a "y" in "my" so maybe "Sphinx" would complete the sentence?
I think your estimations are reasonable, but some further information: it is not just a normal screen (with normal picel density) at a bigger size, but the pixels are rather far apart. So I would assume that this reduces the cost.
They are asking which way the minister wants to define the term.
Wenn es (noch) keine Belege dafür gibt, dass Babys enthauptet wurden, dann gibt es doch keinen Grund das zu behaupten, oder sehe ich hier was falsch?
How is it something that needs "adressing"? When people want to work, but can't, and there is a significant difference between men and women, then that probably needs to be looked at.
Simply seeing "in turkey, a country known for following more traditional ways of life, more men are working than women" is not very relevant.
But I don't think an X-RAY would even qualify as NSFL, would it? I mean you see that factually, that probably hurts, but you get zero impression of it.
Kinda like fotos of the atomic bomb explosions from WW2. You know some people are suffering in the very moment that foto was taken, but you can't see it, so it's not NSFL.
Or do you have a dofferent oppinion?
Isn't this nearly verbatim from an old tumblr post? Or is that the girl being quoted?