MSids

joined 2 years ago
[–] MSids@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Far from my first choice, but maybe he will bring that shotgun and double tap bit from Zombieland to the Bond franchise.

[–] MSids@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago

People do tend to feel frustrated when announcements like this one come out, and I'm sure it was a hard decision for the dev team, but Plex really still just works so well for me. They do a great job.

I'm sure someday a better platform might come along, and when it does I will give it a try, but for me it just wasn't jellyfin. Plex 4 ~~lyfe~~ now.

[–] MSids@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Is there a reason that you don't organize your music by artist\album and leverage tags? It's been some time since I tried Jellyfin, but Plex does an excellent job of tagging (not directly written to original files) and categorizing. It's a good experience.

[–] MSids@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You should not be using NAT to access your Plex externally, I will explain.

App.plex.tv and the apps use Plex services to generate a point to point connection from remote clients through your router to the server. This is important because you never need to expose a private IP to the Internet, and the authentication can be protected with something robust like a Google account which support 2FA and even phishing-resistant 2FA.

The combination of more advanced security and secure/convenient SSO authentication are one of the biggest benefits of Plex in my opinion.

[–] MSids@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Not exactly fashionably late at this point. More like missed the boat entirely. And with a potential Broadcom takeover they will squeeze even harder. I don't anticipate that they will produce anything worth considering.

[–] MSids@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

M&As suck. It's just more consolidation of wealth. Products always suffer, and employees/customers are left worse off.

[–] MSids@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Wasn't it ARM doing the licensing shenanigans here? I've got no real skin in the game for either, but companies with IP to license seem to have become a commodity, and price themselves out of practicality. For that reason I tend to like when they lose their battles. On this one specifically, I was hoping for Qualcomm to win, but only because they're cranking out these incredible laptop processors, showing Intel what a windows laptop on ARM can be - fast, cool, all day battery.

[–] MSids@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

For sure, that makes sense. To me, the biggest transition that I expect to see over the next few years in large enterprises will be to ARM-based Snapdragon chips from Intel and AMD. I'm sure some will also go Apple though.

[–] MSids@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I'm not sure I could see a significant number of enterprises switching to Mac, it's just too tall of an order. My department definitely wouldn't have the bandwidth to do controls, policies, service desk retraining, and internal app rewrites.

Personally I have switched to Mac and am very happy. The performance, OS, and power efficiency of the Macs are just excellent. I'll likely never give up my Android phone.

[–] MSids@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago

Maybe they'll finally pick something important to work on tomorrow. Probably not, but maybe. We still have other issues right? I heard a couple of planes fell out of the sky and eggs are $10 and the ice caps are gonna melt.

[–] MSids@lemmy.world -3 points 5 months ago

Lots of great ideas in this thread. It sounds like you prefer Jellyfin, but I always encourage people to consider Plex. Plex is excellent, and even if you prefer the features or interface of Jellyfin, you should never expose any application (Plex, Jellyfin, or otherwise) directly to the Internet. This should be non-negotiable. Plex uniquely solves for external access with the mobile/desktop apps and app.plex.tv by brokering client connections into your network without a NAT/PAT on your router or firewall. Plex also supports Google logins, which means that you can now have 2fa and potentially phishing-resistant 2fa if you secure your Google account with a passkey.

At my company we only expose our applications behind a WAF and firewall, and I see that some folks here have recommended Cloudflare. For those who may not know, it is no longer enough to simply rely on a firewall. When your application is built with components that may become vulnerable over time, it's critical to use a WAF.

view more: ‹ prev next ›