If there is an equivalent gun with identical performance, then banning a gun because it is "assault" (which is an idiotic term anyway) is plain stupid. If you think those people you mention won't do the same thing with a wooden stock, and all the problems of irresponsible gun owners go away, then I can't really get through to you.

Imagine you own the "restricted" gun or a similar family of guns. Then they suddenly get banned and you need to get rid of your actually worthless guns, because nobody will buy them now. A collector could be down thousands.

You are saying "hot pink" like that's not an insane approach to it. You are still doing the exact same thing that the people who want to ban guns are doing. You are mandating a change of form of how the firearm looks. How about not doing that and letting people own the guns they want to own, if they are using them for hunting, sport, etc? How about not banning the "scary" guns for their looks only?

And this exactly is the issue with gun bans. Just because something looks scary to you, or looks like it's from a videogame doesn't mean it's more capable than other guns, or that it isn't used for hunting.

Having a blueprint skips the "development" phase. Then you make instructions on how to build the stuff and be open to support through issues. From experience it works.

"hahaha guy had a medical condition hahaha what a loser". You do realize that it's a possibility from having a tapeworm? And that it doesn't really pose any complications and saying "it ateba part of their brain" is basically lying?

Dude, you aren't some barely interested dude that "doesn't care about Russia". People have memories and can remember your posts you know. This isn't new for you spreading pro-Russia bullshit, you do it all the time and get downvoted to hell for it. Stop hiding behind "oh I don't really care, buuuuut", you aren't fooling me.

No you said "Nato is an arm of american imperialism" which literally means "everybody evil because puppets of US".

It was a regular question that doesn't fit within your narrow view of "US bad everybody evil because puppets of US"

Ah yes the closer NATO came, since before they had east Germany, Poland and other countries.

Dude. Think about what you are saying or read up more. You are repeating russian propaganda and nothing else. This is a land grab invasion. NATO doesn't have shit to do with it otherwise Russia wouldn't grab all their troops on NATO borders and move them to Ukraine. They know NATO isn't an offensive alliance and are using that, then telling people like you bullshit about NATO encroachment, novorossia or other idiotic ramblings.

That wasn't my question.

Medvedev literally said "we will invade Ukraine anyway after any peace deal goes through". So how is your stance not appeasement of a warmongering dictator?

So if the US gets out of Nato like Trump promised, what then? It magically disolves because there are no sovereign countries in there? Or is it still an arm of american imperialism and all ze eviilz in the world?