Replying to someone claiming NFTs are a scam:

One small but important correction. NFTs are not a scam, it's an amazing technology that has the potential to revolutionize lots of stuff, that became popular when people used it for stupid shit.

Saying NFT is a scam because people have used it to scam others is like saying phones are a scam because people call others over the phone to scam them.

NFTs are essentially a decentralized token. This means that they can be used to represent anything you might want to represent with a token, e.g. ownership of a physical object such as a car or a house; ownership of a digital asset, such as a website or game; some predetermined amount of something, similar to a stock or bonds; etc. The fact that some people used it to mean ownership of random pictures and people thought buying random pictures on the internet for a ridiculous amount of money was a good idea tells you more about people than about the technology.

what does the community think of it?

Everyone has their own opinion, personally I think they're a great idea and have lots of great applications. But just like rolling vs non-rolling release it's a personal and application dependant choice.

Do the downsides outweigh the benefits or vice versa?

Again, depends, for my personal computer I wouldn't use it because I think it could get complicated to get specific things to work, but for closed hardware like the Deck or even a fairly stable desktop used as a gaming system it's perfect.

Could this help Linux reach more mainstream audiences?

It could, it can also hamper it because people might start to try solutions that only work until next boot and not understanding why, or having problems getting some special hardware to work (more than it would be a mutable distro). But there is a great counter to this which is that once it's running it will be very difficult to break by user error.

At the end of the day I think it's a cool technology but that people should know what they're getting into, just like when choosing rolling vs non-rolling distro, it's not about what's better, but what suits your needs best.

And you're not alone, in fact I would guess you're part of the majority. But we tend to live in bubbles surrounded by tech savvy people so we forget about it sometimes. And the problem with not knowing something is possible is not realizing its limitations, someone who's eaten hot dogs every day of their life has no idea what a burguer is, is one intrinsically better than the other? Nope, but they're different, and different people might like different things.

In any case, just like the other comment, if you have any questions feel free to ask, there's a thriving community of people who use Linux and some of us were like you so we know where you're coming from.

I wonder how much of it is people's taste changing. As in people who didn't eat good food before starting to realize there's more to food than fast food so their opinion of McDonald's changing over time.

I ask this because in South America and Europe McDonald's has always been consistently the same taste since I can remember. There were a couple of random specific locations where the food was subpar, but in general it's been the same, a Big Mac is a Big Mac since I started going to McDonald's over 30 years ago and in every city I've eaten it (never been to the US though).

Over a billion people have gone from not having plumbing to having indoor toilets, heating/cooling systems and access to modern health care in the space of 50 years.

I'll reply to this with a quote from C. K. Lewis:

Of course slavery is the worst thing that ever happened. Every time it has happened – black people in America, Jews in Egypt, every time a whole race of people has been enslaved, it’s a horrible thing.

But maybe every incredible human achievement in history was done with slaves. Every single thing where you go, ‘How did they build those pyramids?’ They just threw human death and suffering at them until they were finished…There is no end to what you can do when you don’t give a f*ck about particular people

Hence why I compared it to he economic miracle of Nazi Germany.

It's perfectly normal, especially when you're still so green. I've distro hopped lots for my first 4 years, started with Ubuntu, and tried a bunch of stuff until settling for Arch back in 2008. Since then I've tried one or another distro for some amount of time or specific purpose, e.g. servers running Debian, work machines running Ubuntu, and there was a 2 year gap where I used Gentoo as my main system (but despite things that I loved there, I just didn't had the patience). Just the other day I was talking about Bazzite with someone here on Lemmy, and they made such a good defense for it that I might install it on a VM for testing, I've also been wanting to give NixOS a serious try any day. All of which is to say, yes man, trying different stuff is normal, even if you're perfectly happy with what you have you won't know if there's anything better for you unless you try it, I used to think I was happy on Windows.

I'm not opposed to there being good stuff in China, but the economic miracle of China was built on top of slave labor and repression. It's easy to get an economic miracle if you're willing to sacrifice part of your population, which is why I have the Germany example since that's exactly what was done there.

Overall China is getting better, and in a couple of generations they might be a relatively nice place to live, but don't fool yourself into thinking that people there today are as free as people living in a democratic nation.

While I also strongly recommend Dead Cells like others, I think it's best if you first play Rogue Legacy. Let's put it this way, if Rogue Legacy is like a good cup of coffee, dead cells is cocaine, or maybe crack.

Your question contains hints at where you're coming from.

At first, I started thinking that maybe some Lemmy users are really unhappy and find criticizing a something stronger helped them feel better

You look at the criticism and you think they're simply people being jealous or something, that's not it at all. To be fair I'm not sure about what criticism are you seeing constantly, but the ones I've encountered mostly reflect my own criticism of it, e.g. the worst health care in the world, terrible education, abismal class gap, blatant racism, police brutality, overspenditure in military, school shootings, etc, etc, etc. Let me be absolutely clear, the US is NOT stronger than any developed country in any of these, I've lived in places with terrible healthcare that I would not wish on my worst enemy and they're still leaps and bounds better than what you guys have.

But, we don't see them do that with other targets, just the US.

But we do, the difference is no one is making posts claiming Russia is a better country and that's why people criticize it. And most other countries accept their shortcomings, take it from the thread a while back from what people in the US need to hear and the similar one for Europe. Every single one of the answers on the US had someone saying that it was just jealousy, or that it wasn't all that bad, or that that was better than the alternative, or one guy even tried to tell me that his city had none of those issues. On the other hand in the EU one most of the answers were more akin to "you're right, this is something that's really bad here".

reject the US entirely. In other words, they may be Russian, Chinese, et al. agents working to feed a stream of propaganda in order to further cause chaos and lack of unity in the West as we have seen them do before.

Let me be extremely clear here, Fuck Russia, Fuck China. For all of my criticisms of the USA it is still a (very weird and indirect) democracy. So if I had to choose between those 3 I'll take the USA every day of the week and twice on Sunday. Luckily I don't, and I can live in a country without any of the issues I see there and express my opinion on how poorly the USA treats their citizens (you have to keep paying taxes after moving abroad for crying out loud) in the same manner I would express myself against any other country doing the same.

Criticize something obviously unjust that the US has done. Ignore that all other major powers have also committed atrocities.

Most of the criticism I see re for what the US is doing NOW, not in the past.

Paint the US entirely as evil so that nothing the US can do is just

I don't think that's what the majority is doing, there could be a few people like it, but for the major part I think people recognize that the USA is a a "decent" place to live, especially when compared to Russia or China. But what you need to understand is that it's not the greatest country of all like you think, most of us would not move there unless we were offered ludicrous amounts of money.

EU and Russia on the same team lol

No one in Europe believes that, in fact you can still see plenty of Ukrainian flags around.

West fragments as US and EU relationship dwindle from pseudo-populist movements (e.g. MAGA)

If you think MAGA is pseudo-populism I would hate to see what you consider as real populism.

The short answer is that you're probably not used to people telling you the US is not all that great, so you see that as an attack, and you think that because people criticize you that means they are trying to make others hate you, but I think most of us are just pointing your shortcomings because a lot of you act like very entitled narcissists who think there's nothing wrong with the USA so obviously those who speak against it must be puppets.

TL;DR: criticism of the USA doesn't mean there's nothing good there, much less is it an endorsing Russia or China. But you don't need to tell narcissists what they're doing well, they'll tell you themselves.

Have you stopped to consider that the current solution might be better than an all JIRA one? I can definitely see a lot of "file ingestion" pipelines that would be much better handled by a bunch of different systems intertwined than JIRA, especially for automated file ingestion (which I guess is what you're doing? Hard to know but hard for it to be something else).

I don't know what's the situation there, but if I was an engineer on one such project I would explain to the person why it's not feasible, but it could be that that got interpreted as not explaining stuff. An easy to understand example would be someone asking what's the best way to replace a car (that has been cobbled to pieces from separate cars) with a shoe, and then you try to explain to the person that that just doesn't make sense they say that you're being uncooperative and not explaining how the car works so you can make the shoe do the same.

Look, I'm not saying this is your case, but it feels like you're approaching this the wrong way, you have a new solution without even understanding the current one. A better approach would be to gather the engineers and ask them what are THEIR problems with the system, and how would THEY like to fix them. If the Jira thing comes from higher ups tell them that this is a new requirement, but let THEM solve the technical issues, you are unlikely to be able to even if they explain them to you in detail.

Some larger projects have what's called a feature bounty, like others have mentioned $20 is very low for someone not familiar with the codebase to do it, it might be enough for someone already familiar with it (but I seriously doubt it since it involves at least some refactoring of the UI to add a shuffle button). However if more people want that feature they can each contribute a small amount and eventually it would be a value that would justify someone to learn the codebase.

That being said, like someone else pointed out, it seems the app is going through some rewriting, so I wouldn't expect any new features (especially those involving UI) anytime soon.

Finally there are two issues mentioning shuffle in the GitHub, https://github.com/jarnedemeulemeester/findroid/issues/334 and https://github.com/jarnedemeulemeester/findroid/issues/547 you might want to create an account there and voice your wanting of that feature too, by either adding a thumbs up or a comment explaining why this is important to you.

Good luck, hope you get your shuffle play!

Edit: forgot to answer your question directly, yes, you can pay someone to contribute to an open source project, nothing wrong about that. But as a general rule it would be cheaper to give money to the people who are already working on the project.

It's 100% better detection. ADHD is not something you develop, just like autism or type 1 diabetes. It is measurable (it's visible on MRIs as an underdeveloped prefrontal cortex) and some of the symptoms can be treated with drugs, but the person's body will never not need them (just like type 1 diabetes).

Suggesting that TikTok causes ADHD is similar to suggesting that sodas cause type 1 diabetes, the rise of one correlates with the other because if every kid is consuming soda/TikTok it's easier to spot the ones with Diabetes/ADHD, not because of a cause-effect relationship but because some of them will react differently.