Parodper

Why do you need a fediverse for this? The issue with the media isn't where to host things, it's how to pay your writers.

Tried it for a bit, seems to be Arch-based, but pacman wasn't installed. And it's very much an alpha.

Also, there's a warning if you don't have 40GB free. That hurt.

Yes, they're focused on linking other news about Europe. For original articles you could check out the EUObserver.

Laughs from Spain

That’s just the result of violent revolution, necessarily carried out by people so convinced that their ideology is right that they’ll use violence to assert it. Revolution requires unity, so dissidents present a real risk to a nascent movement.

I've heard it phrased as the Bolsheviks never really leaving behind their «underground party» phase.

Now that you mention that, I seem to recall something similar does already exist in the EU Parliament. Blue Cards, which I think every MEP has a few of.

From the first article (which I admit I just skimmed the top of it):

And to spice things up further, the group is also planning to “hijack” next week’s debate by attending as a group and using the so-called Blue Cards system on each other to allow them to start an impromptu Q&A with the speaker, according to Boeselager, who coordinates the group.

Could be interesting to see how that turns out.

There's a quote in there:

For instance, it is not possible to interrupt a speaker at will, something that's common in many national parliaments.

Where? At least here in Spain, you can't interrupt the speaker when they have the floor. Doing otherwise seems like a recipe for disaster.

Cathedral-style coding isn’t very Open-Source

Cathedral vs bazaar is about development process, nothing to do with source code availability.

Nah, git has a bad command line UX. Which is why the developers are working to make it better, i.e. moving from checkout to switch.

The current system DOES allow it

Technically true, not in practice. On almost half of the provinces (those with less than 4 seats)* you risk your vote going to waste if you don't vote for one of the big two parties.

it’s not a system like the American one, what does not allow it’s the will of the voters

It's the same issue, but worse in their case. The American system also allows it if only the voters massively voted for some third party.

those on the right do not like a center party.

Do they?

* In fact, you could even include those with 5 seats, which would put it over the 50% of provinces and 30% of seats.

Unfortunately the current system doesn't allow a small center party to survive and add nuance to the political scene.

There isn't a binary «veto»/«simple majority». Supermajorities exist, and the Council already has rules like double-majorities to preserver a smaller country's voice. Vetoes only work for small groups, and cause gridlock in all other cases.

Ireland, for instance is constitutionally neutral

That's why article 42 is worded that way. Ireland (and Austria) not being able to contribute directly doesn't mean that the 25 other countries can't act.