[-] R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 45 points 1 month ago

Lol. I have no idea how Microsoft convinces these companies that they're the "secure" option. My workplace has banned any AI except copilot, because Microsoft told them copilot is secure.

[-] R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 2 months ago

This is a crazy thing to say about a 7 year old handheld lmfaooooo

[-] R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 61 points 5 months ago

Well tbf chatGPT also shouldn't remember and then leak those passwords lol.

[-] R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 5 months ago

Why are we resigned to there being a trillionaire in the future when it hasn't happened yet? There is time to stop it from happening. We can just kill them.

[-] R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 41 points 6 months ago

Sure would be nice if capitalism didn't exist 🤪

[-] R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 7 months ago

It's more of a satire of them but sure.

[-] R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Being fooled by Twitter users is worse as they can link to reputable sources (that usually wouldn't post clickbait/bad headings). There's also little incentive for twitter users to not post misleading headlines, while (some) journalists/news sites are trying to build a reputation of reputability. Yes, it would be solved by clicking the article, but you shouldn't have to click every article to make sure the poster isn't lying about the content.

[-] R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 11 months ago

Idk why he couldn't have just created a new @ equivalent for his X accounts or whatever he's doing. A $ sign would work, or a +, -, *, !, anything really. If he's trying to make these be the "official" accounts then they don't need to use the same @ symbol.

[-] R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 44 points 11 months ago

You're taking the argument at it's most basic level, assuming that we would kill the billionaires and then sit around twiddling out thumbs. I don't think it's much of a leap to assume we'd change how the system works as well lol.

[-] R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I wonder how much of this is fulfilment of old orders (prior to Musk ruining his public image). It'd be interesting to see a chart of the amount of orders they're getting rather than cars they're shipping.

[-] R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 39 points 1 year ago

They would get anything the activity pub protocol gives them, which I can't imagine is much. I'd have to look into it but I assume they're pretty much only sharing the stuff you see.

... Ok so I looked it up (couldn't leave it on the assumption lol). https://activitypub.rocks/implementation-report/ Have a look at the standard here if you like. The only privacy related one I can see is the location header, but it's optional and not implemented by most fediverse apps.

That's not to say it will never become possible for Facebook to get more info. They will absolutely try to throw their weight around if they gain traction in the space, and could, in theory, require more info be shared for fediverse instances that want to federate with Threads. This is why it's important that fediverse admins don't get too chummy with the zucc.

Meta will absolutely try to appear friendly at first, perhaps offering open source development assistance, consulting or training, but it will be a farce to gain power in the space.

Meta are ruthless in the social media space.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

R00bot

joined 1 year ago